Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem 19.9dev

Description: 19.9d in the case of an existential quantifier, avoiding the ax-10 from nfex that would be used for the hypothesis of 19.9d , at the cost of an additional DV condition on y , ph . (Contributed by SN, 26-May-2024)

Ref Expression
Hypothesis 19.9dev.1 ( 𝜑 → Ⅎ 𝑥 𝜓 )
Assertion 19.9dev ( 𝜑 → ( ∃ 𝑥𝑦 𝜓 ↔ ∃ 𝑦 𝜓 ) )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 19.9dev.1 ( 𝜑 → Ⅎ 𝑥 𝜓 )
2 excom ( ∃ 𝑥𝑦 𝜓 ↔ ∃ 𝑦𝑥 𝜓 )
3 19.9t ( Ⅎ 𝑥 𝜓 → ( ∃ 𝑥 𝜓𝜓 ) )
4 1 3 syl ( 𝜑 → ( ∃ 𝑥 𝜓𝜓 ) )
5 4 exbidv ( 𝜑 → ( ∃ 𝑦𝑥 𝜓 ↔ ∃ 𝑦 𝜓 ) )
6 2 5 syl5bb ( 𝜑 → ( ∃ 𝑥𝑦 𝜓 ↔ ∃ 𝑦 𝜓 ) )