Description: Equality of a class variable and a class abstraction (also called a
class builder). Theorem 5.1 of Quine p. 34. This theorem shows the
relationship between expressions with class abstractions and expressions
with class variables. Note that abbi and its relatives are among
those useful for converting theorems with class variables to equivalent
theorems with wff variables, by first substituting a class abstraction
for each class variable.

Class variables can always be eliminated from a theorem to result in an
equivalent theorem with wff variables, and vice-versa. The idea is
roughly as follows. To convert a theorem with a wff variable ph
(that has a free variable x ) to a theorem with a class variable
A , we substitute x e. A for ph throughout and simplify,
where A is a new class variable not already in the wff. An example
is the conversion of zfauscl to inex1 (look at the instance of
zfauscl that occurs in the proof of inex1 ). Conversely, to convert
a theorem with a class variable A to one with ph , we substitute
{ x | ph } for A throughout and simplify, where x and ph
are new setvar and wff variables not already in the wff. Examples
include dfsymdif2 and cp ; the latter derives a formula containing
wff variables from substitution instances of the class variables in its
equivalent formulation cplem2 . For more information on class
variables, see Quine pp. 15-21 and/or Takeuti and Zaring pp. 10-13.
(Contributed by NM, 26-May-1993)