Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem bnj544

Description: Technical lemma for bnj852 . This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011) (New usage is discouraged.)

Ref Expression
Hypotheses bnj544.1 ⊢ ( 𝜑′ ↔ ( 𝑓 ‘ ∅ ) = pred ( 𝑥 , 𝐴 , 𝑅 ) )
bnj544.2 ⊢ ( 𝜓′ ↔ ∀ 𝑖 ∈ ω ( suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑚 → ( 𝑓 ‘ suc 𝑖 ) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ ( 𝑓 ‘ 𝑖 ) pred ( 𝑦 , 𝐴 , 𝑅 ) ) )
bnj544.3 ⊢ 𝐷 = ( ω ∖ { ∅ } )
bnj544.4 ⊢ 𝐺 = ( 𝑓 ∪ { ⟨ 𝑚 , ∪ 𝑦 ∈ ( 𝑓 ‘ 𝑝 ) pred ( 𝑦 , 𝐴 , 𝑅 ) ⟩ } )
bnj544.5 ⊢ ( 𝜏 ↔ ( 𝑓 Fn 𝑚 ∧ 𝜑′ ∧ 𝜓′ ) )
bnj544.6 ⊢ ( 𝜎 ↔ ( 𝑚 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 ∈ 𝑚 ) )
Assertion bnj544 ( ( 𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜎 ) → 𝐺 Fn 𝑛 )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 bnj544.1 ⊢ ( 𝜑′ ↔ ( 𝑓 ‘ ∅ ) = pred ( 𝑥 , 𝐴 , 𝑅 ) )
2 bnj544.2 ⊢ ( 𝜓′ ↔ ∀ 𝑖 ∈ ω ( suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑚 → ( 𝑓 ‘ suc 𝑖 ) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ ( 𝑓 ‘ 𝑖 ) pred ( 𝑦 , 𝐴 , 𝑅 ) ) )
3 bnj544.3 ⊢ 𝐷 = ( ω ∖ { ∅ } )
4 bnj544.4 ⊢ 𝐺 = ( 𝑓 ∪ { ⟨ 𝑚 , ∪ 𝑦 ∈ ( 𝑓 ‘ 𝑝 ) pred ( 𝑦 , 𝐴 , 𝑅 ) ⟩ } )
5 bnj544.5 ⊢ ( 𝜏 ↔ ( 𝑓 Fn 𝑚 ∧ 𝜑′ ∧ 𝜓′ ) )
6 bnj544.6 ⊢ ( 𝜎 ↔ ( 𝑚 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 ∈ 𝑚 ) )
7 3 bnj923 ⊢ ( 𝑚 ∈ 𝐷 → 𝑚 ∈ ω )
8 7 3anim1i ⊢ ( ( 𝑚 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 ∈ 𝑚 ) → ( 𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 ∈ 𝑚 ) )
9 6 8 sylbi ⊢ ( 𝜎 → ( 𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 ∈ 𝑚 ) )
10 biid ⊢ ( ( 𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 ∈ 𝑚 ) ↔ ( 𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 ∈ 𝑚 ) )
11 1 2 4 5 10 bnj543 ⊢ ( ( 𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ ( 𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 ∈ 𝑚 ) ) → 𝐺 Fn 𝑛 )
12 9 11 syl3an3 ⊢ ( ( 𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜎 ) → 𝐺 Fn 𝑛 )