Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem dfproplem

Description: Given a set A, the set of all variables encoded as natural numbers, negations of elements in A, and implications between elements of A forms a set. This lemma is used when using fvmptd on the defining function of PROP . (Contributed by Thomas van Maaren, 21-Aug-2026)

Ref Expression
Hypothesis dfproplem.a 𝐴 ∈ V
Assertion dfproplem { 𝑥 ∣ ( ∃ 𝑧𝐴 ( 𝑥 = ( prop¬ ‘ 𝑧 ) ∨ ∃ 𝑤𝐴 𝑥 = ( 𝑤 prop→ 𝑧 ) ) ∨ ∃ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ 𝑥 = ( propvar ‘ 𝑛 ) ) } ∈ V

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 dfproplem.a 𝐴 ∈ V
2 df-iun 𝑧𝐴 ( { ( prop¬ ‘ 𝑧 ) } ∪ 𝑤𝐴 { ( 𝑤 prop→ 𝑧 ) } ) = { 𝑥 ∣ ∃ 𝑧𝐴 𝑥 ∈ ( { ( prop¬ ‘ 𝑧 ) } ∪ 𝑤𝐴 { ( 𝑤 prop→ 𝑧 ) } ) }
3 df-sn { ( prop¬ ‘ 𝑧 ) } = { 𝑥𝑥 = ( prop¬ ‘ 𝑧 ) }
4 iunsn 𝑤𝐴 { ( 𝑤 prop→ 𝑧 ) } = { 𝑥 ∣ ∃ 𝑤𝐴 𝑥 = ( 𝑤 prop→ 𝑧 ) }
5 3 4 uneq12i ( { ( prop¬ ‘ 𝑧 ) } ∪ 𝑤𝐴 { ( 𝑤 prop→ 𝑧 ) } ) = ( { 𝑥𝑥 = ( prop¬ ‘ 𝑧 ) } ∪ { 𝑥 ∣ ∃ 𝑤𝐴 𝑥 = ( 𝑤 prop→ 𝑧 ) } )
6 unab ( { 𝑥𝑥 = ( prop¬ ‘ 𝑧 ) } ∪ { 𝑥 ∣ ∃ 𝑤𝐴 𝑥 = ( 𝑤 prop→ 𝑧 ) } ) = { 𝑥 ∣ ( 𝑥 = ( prop¬ ‘ 𝑧 ) ∨ ∃ 𝑤𝐴 𝑥 = ( 𝑤 prop→ 𝑧 ) ) }
7 5 6 eqtri ( { ( prop¬ ‘ 𝑧 ) } ∪ 𝑤𝐴 { ( 𝑤 prop→ 𝑧 ) } ) = { 𝑥 ∣ ( 𝑥 = ( prop¬ ‘ 𝑧 ) ∨ ∃ 𝑤𝐴 𝑥 = ( 𝑤 prop→ 𝑧 ) ) }
8 7 eqabri ( 𝑥 ∈ ( { ( prop¬ ‘ 𝑧 ) } ∪ 𝑤𝐴 { ( 𝑤 prop→ 𝑧 ) } ) ↔ ( 𝑥 = ( prop¬ ‘ 𝑧 ) ∨ ∃ 𝑤𝐴 𝑥 = ( 𝑤 prop→ 𝑧 ) ) )
9 8 rexbii ( ∃ 𝑧𝐴 𝑥 ∈ ( { ( prop¬ ‘ 𝑧 ) } ∪ 𝑤𝐴 { ( 𝑤 prop→ 𝑧 ) } ) ↔ ∃ 𝑧𝐴 ( 𝑥 = ( prop¬ ‘ 𝑧 ) ∨ ∃ 𝑤𝐴 𝑥 = ( 𝑤 prop→ 𝑧 ) ) )
10 9 abbii { 𝑥 ∣ ∃ 𝑧𝐴 𝑥 ∈ ( { ( prop¬ ‘ 𝑧 ) } ∪ 𝑤𝐴 { ( 𝑤 prop→ 𝑧 ) } ) } = { 𝑥 ∣ ∃ 𝑧𝐴 ( 𝑥 = ( prop¬ ‘ 𝑧 ) ∨ ∃ 𝑤𝐴 𝑥 = ( 𝑤 prop→ 𝑧 ) ) }
11 2 10 eqtri 𝑧𝐴 ( { ( prop¬ ‘ 𝑧 ) } ∪ 𝑤𝐴 { ( 𝑤 prop→ 𝑧 ) } ) = { 𝑥 ∣ ∃ 𝑧𝐴 ( 𝑥 = ( prop¬ ‘ 𝑧 ) ∨ ∃ 𝑤𝐴 𝑥 = ( 𝑤 prop→ 𝑧 ) ) }
12 iunsn 𝑛 ∈ ℕ { ( propvar ‘ 𝑛 ) } = { 𝑥 ∣ ∃ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ 𝑥 = ( propvar ‘ 𝑛 ) }
13 11 12 uneq12i ( 𝑧𝐴 ( { ( prop¬ ‘ 𝑧 ) } ∪ 𝑤𝐴 { ( 𝑤 prop→ 𝑧 ) } ) ∪ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ { ( propvar ‘ 𝑛 ) } ) = ( { 𝑥 ∣ ∃ 𝑧𝐴 ( 𝑥 = ( prop¬ ‘ 𝑧 ) ∨ ∃ 𝑤𝐴 𝑥 = ( 𝑤 prop→ 𝑧 ) ) } ∪ { 𝑥 ∣ ∃ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ 𝑥 = ( propvar ‘ 𝑛 ) } )
14 unab ( { 𝑥 ∣ ∃ 𝑧𝐴 ( 𝑥 = ( prop¬ ‘ 𝑧 ) ∨ ∃ 𝑤𝐴 𝑥 = ( 𝑤 prop→ 𝑧 ) ) } ∪ { 𝑥 ∣ ∃ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ 𝑥 = ( propvar ‘ 𝑛 ) } ) = { 𝑥 ∣ ( ∃ 𝑧𝐴 ( 𝑥 = ( prop¬ ‘ 𝑧 ) ∨ ∃ 𝑤𝐴 𝑥 = ( 𝑤 prop→ 𝑧 ) ) ∨ ∃ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ 𝑥 = ( propvar ‘ 𝑛 ) ) }
15 13 14 eqtri ( 𝑧𝐴 ( { ( prop¬ ‘ 𝑧 ) } ∪ 𝑤𝐴 { ( 𝑤 prop→ 𝑧 ) } ) ∪ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ { ( propvar ‘ 𝑛 ) } ) = { 𝑥 ∣ ( ∃ 𝑧𝐴 ( 𝑥 = ( prop¬ ‘ 𝑧 ) ∨ ∃ 𝑤𝐴 𝑥 = ( 𝑤 prop→ 𝑧 ) ) ∨ ∃ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ 𝑥 = ( propvar ‘ 𝑛 ) ) }
16 snex { ( prop¬ ‘ 𝑧 ) } ∈ V
17 snex { ( 𝑤 prop→ 𝑧 ) } ∈ V
18 1 17 iunex 𝑤𝐴 { ( 𝑤 prop→ 𝑧 ) } ∈ V
19 16 18 unex ( { ( prop¬ ‘ 𝑧 ) } ∪ 𝑤𝐴 { ( 𝑤 prop→ 𝑧 ) } ) ∈ V
20 1 19 iunex 𝑧𝐴 ( { ( prop¬ ‘ 𝑧 ) } ∪ 𝑤𝐴 { ( 𝑤 prop→ 𝑧 ) } ) ∈ V
21 nnex ℕ ∈ V
22 snex { ( propvar ‘ 𝑛 ) } ∈ V
23 21 22 iunex 𝑛 ∈ ℕ { ( propvar ‘ 𝑛 ) } ∈ V
24 20 23 unex ( 𝑧𝐴 ( { ( prop¬ ‘ 𝑧 ) } ∪ 𝑤𝐴 { ( 𝑤 prop→ 𝑧 ) } ) ∪ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ { ( propvar ‘ 𝑛 ) } ) ∈ V
25 15 24 eqeltrri { 𝑥 ∣ ( ∃ 𝑧𝐴 ( 𝑥 = ( prop¬ ‘ 𝑧 ) ∨ ∃ 𝑤𝐴 𝑥 = ( 𝑤 prop→ 𝑧 ) ) ∨ ∃ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ 𝑥 = ( propvar ‘ 𝑛 ) ) } ∈ V