Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem nfabd2

Description: Bound-variable hypothesis builder for a class abstraction. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 . (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Oct-2016) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 10-May-2023) (New usage is discouraged.)

Ref Expression
Hypotheses nfabd2.1 ⊢ Ⅎ 𝑦 𝜑
nfabd2.2 ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀ 𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 ) → Ⅎ 𝑥 𝜓 )
Assertion nfabd2 ( 𝜑 → Ⅎ 𝑥 { 𝑦 ∣ 𝜓 } )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 nfabd2.1 ⊢ Ⅎ 𝑦 𝜑
2 nfabd2.2 ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀ 𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 ) → Ⅎ 𝑥 𝜓 )
3 nfnae ⊢ Ⅎ 𝑦 ¬ ∀ 𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦
4 1 3 nfan ⊢ Ⅎ 𝑦 ( 𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀ 𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 )
5 4 2 nfabd ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀ 𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 ) → Ⅎ 𝑥 { 𝑦 ∣ 𝜓 } )
6 5 ex ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( ¬ ∀ 𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → Ⅎ 𝑥 { 𝑦 ∣ 𝜓 } ) )
7 nfab1 ⊢ Ⅎ 𝑦 { 𝑦 ∣ 𝜓 }
8 eqidd ⊢ ( ∀ 𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → { 𝑦 ∣ 𝜓 } = { 𝑦 ∣ 𝜓 } )
9 8 drnfc1 ⊢ ( ∀ 𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ( Ⅎ 𝑥 { 𝑦 ∣ 𝜓 } ↔ Ⅎ 𝑦 { 𝑦 ∣ 𝜓 } ) )
10 7 9 mpbiri ⊢ ( ∀ 𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → Ⅎ 𝑥 { 𝑦 ∣ 𝜓 } )
11 6 10 pm2.61d2 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → Ⅎ 𝑥 { 𝑦 ∣ 𝜓 } )