Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem nfexd2

Description: Variation on nfexd which adds the hypothesis that x and y are distinct in the inner subproof. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Oct-2016) Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 . Use nfexd instead. (New usage is discouraged.)

Ref Expression
Hypotheses nfald2.1 𝑦 𝜑
nfald2.2 ( ( 𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀ 𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 ) → Ⅎ 𝑥 𝜓 )
Assertion nfexd2 ( 𝜑 → Ⅎ 𝑥𝑦 𝜓 )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 nfald2.1 𝑦 𝜑
2 nfald2.2 ( ( 𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀ 𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 ) → Ⅎ 𝑥 𝜓 )
3 df-ex ( ∃ 𝑦 𝜓 ↔ ¬ ∀ 𝑦 ¬ 𝜓 )
4 2 nfnd ( ( 𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀ 𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 ) → Ⅎ 𝑥 ¬ 𝜓 )
5 1 4 nfald2 ( 𝜑 → Ⅎ 𝑥𝑦 ¬ 𝜓 )
6 5 nfnd ( 𝜑 → Ⅎ 𝑥 ¬ ∀ 𝑦 ¬ 𝜓 )
7 3 6 nfxfrd ( 𝜑 → Ⅎ 𝑥𝑦 𝜓 )