Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem rabbida2

Description: Equivalent wff's yield equal restricted class abstractions. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021)

Ref Expression
Hypotheses rabbida2.1 ⊢ Ⅎ 𝑥 𝜑
rabbida2.2 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵 )
rabbida2.3 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝜓 ↔ 𝜒 ) )
Assertion rabbida2 ( 𝜑 → { 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓 } = { 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜒 } )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 rabbida2.1 ⊢ Ⅎ 𝑥 𝜑
2 rabbida2.2 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵 )
3 rabbida2.3 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝜓 ↔ 𝜒 ) )
4 2 eleq2d ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ) )
5 4 3 anbi12d ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓 ) ↔ ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜒 ) ) )
6 1 5 abbid ⊢ ( 𝜑 → { 𝑥 ∣ ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓 ) } = { 𝑥 ∣ ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜒 ) } )
7 df-rab ⊢ { 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓 } = { 𝑥 ∣ ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓 ) }
8 df-rab ⊢ { 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜒 } = { 𝑥 ∣ ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜒 ) }
9 6 7 8 3eqtr4g ⊢ ( 𝜑 → { 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓 } = { 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜒 } )