Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem rabeqd

Description: Deduction form of rabeq . Note that contrary to rabeq it has no disjoint variable condition. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Apr-2019)

Ref Expression
Hypotheses rabeqd.nf ⊢ Ⅎ 𝑥 𝜑
rabeqd.1 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵 )
Assertion rabeqd ( 𝜑 → { 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓 } = { 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜓 } )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 rabeqd.nf ⊢ Ⅎ 𝑥 𝜑
2 rabeqd.1 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵 )
3 eleq2 ⊢ ( 𝐴 = 𝐵 → ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ) )
4 3 anbi1d ⊢ ( 𝐴 = 𝐵 → ( ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓 ) ↔ ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓 ) ) )
5 2 4 syl ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓 ) ↔ ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓 ) ) )
6 1 5 rabbida4 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → { 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓 } = { 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜓 } )