Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem rp-fakeuninass

Description: A special case where a mixture of union and intersection appears to conform to a mixed associative law. (Contributed by RP, 29-Feb-2020)

Ref Expression
Assertion rp-fakeuninass ( 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ↔ ( ( 𝐴 ∪ 𝐵 ) ∩ 𝐶 ) = ( 𝐴 ∪ ( 𝐵 ∩ 𝐶 ) ) )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 rp-fakeinunass ⊢ ( 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ↔ ( ( 𝐶 ∩ 𝐵 ) ∪ 𝐴 ) = ( 𝐶 ∩ ( 𝐵 ∪ 𝐴 ) ) )
2 eqcom ⊢ ( ( ( 𝐶 ∩ 𝐵 ) ∪ 𝐴 ) = ( 𝐶 ∩ ( 𝐵 ∪ 𝐴 ) ) ↔ ( 𝐶 ∩ ( 𝐵 ∪ 𝐴 ) ) = ( ( 𝐶 ∩ 𝐵 ) ∪ 𝐴 ) )
3 incom ⊢ ( 𝐶 ∩ ( 𝐵 ∪ 𝐴 ) ) = ( ( 𝐵 ∪ 𝐴 ) ∩ 𝐶 )
4 uncom ⊢ ( 𝐵 ∪ 𝐴 ) = ( 𝐴 ∪ 𝐵 )
5 4 ineq1i ⊢ ( ( 𝐵 ∪ 𝐴 ) ∩ 𝐶 ) = ( ( 𝐴 ∪ 𝐵 ) ∩ 𝐶 )
6 3 5 eqtri ⊢ ( 𝐶 ∩ ( 𝐵 ∪ 𝐴 ) ) = ( ( 𝐴 ∪ 𝐵 ) ∩ 𝐶 )
7 uncom ⊢ ( ( 𝐶 ∩ 𝐵 ) ∪ 𝐴 ) = ( 𝐴 ∪ ( 𝐶 ∩ 𝐵 ) )
8 incom ⊢ ( 𝐶 ∩ 𝐵 ) = ( 𝐵 ∩ 𝐶 )
9 8 uneq2i ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∪ ( 𝐶 ∩ 𝐵 ) ) = ( 𝐴 ∪ ( 𝐵 ∩ 𝐶 ) )
10 7 9 eqtri ⊢ ( ( 𝐶 ∩ 𝐵 ) ∪ 𝐴 ) = ( 𝐴 ∪ ( 𝐵 ∩ 𝐶 ) )
11 6 10 eqeq12i ⊢ ( ( 𝐶 ∩ ( 𝐵 ∪ 𝐴 ) ) = ( ( 𝐶 ∩ 𝐵 ) ∪ 𝐴 ) ↔ ( ( 𝐴 ∪ 𝐵 ) ∩ 𝐶 ) = ( 𝐴 ∪ ( 𝐵 ∩ 𝐶 ) ) )
12 1 2 11 3bitri ⊢ ( 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ↔ ( ( 𝐴 ∪ 𝐵 ) ∩ 𝐶 ) = ( 𝐴 ∪ ( 𝐵 ∩ 𝐶 ) ) )