Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem wdom2d2

Description: Deduction for weak dominance by a Cartesian product.MOVABLE (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Jul-2015)

Ref Expression
Hypotheses wdom2d2.a ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 )
wdom2d2.b ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 )
wdom2d2.c ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋 )
wdom2d2.o ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ) → ∃ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥 = 𝑋 )
Assertion wdom2d2 ( 𝜑 → 𝐴 ≼* ( 𝐵 × 𝐶 ) )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 wdom2d2.a ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 )
2 wdom2d2.b ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 )
3 wdom2d2.c ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋 )
4 wdom2d2.o ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ) → ∃ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥 = 𝑋 )
5 2 3 xpexd ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝐵 × 𝐶 ) ∈ V )
6 nfcsb1v ⊢ Ⅎ 𝑦 ⦋ ( 1st ‘ 𝑤 ) / 𝑦 ⦌ ⦋ ( 2nd ‘ 𝑤 ) / 𝑧 ⦌ 𝑋
7 6 nfeq2 ⊢ Ⅎ 𝑦 𝑥 = ⦋ ( 1st ‘ 𝑤 ) / 𝑦 ⦌ ⦋ ( 2nd ‘ 𝑤 ) / 𝑧 ⦌ 𝑋
8 nfcv ⊢ Ⅎ 𝑧 ( 1st ‘ 𝑤 )
9 nfcsb1v ⊢ Ⅎ 𝑧 ⦋ ( 2nd ‘ 𝑤 ) / 𝑧 ⦌ 𝑋
10 8 9 nfcsbw ⊢ Ⅎ 𝑧 ⦋ ( 1st ‘ 𝑤 ) / 𝑦 ⦌ ⦋ ( 2nd ‘ 𝑤 ) / 𝑧 ⦌ 𝑋
11 10 nfeq2 ⊢ Ⅎ 𝑧 𝑥 = ⦋ ( 1st ‘ 𝑤 ) / 𝑦 ⦌ ⦋ ( 2nd ‘ 𝑤 ) / 𝑧 ⦌ 𝑋
12 nfv ⊢ Ⅎ 𝑤 𝑥 = 𝑋
13 csbopeq1a ⊢ ( 𝑤 = ⟨ 𝑦 , 𝑧 ⟩ → ⦋ ( 1st ‘ 𝑤 ) / 𝑦 ⦌ ⦋ ( 2nd ‘ 𝑤 ) / 𝑧 ⦌ 𝑋 = 𝑋 )
14 13 eqeq2d ⊢ ( 𝑤 = ⟨ 𝑦 , 𝑧 ⟩ → ( 𝑥 = ⦋ ( 1st ‘ 𝑤 ) / 𝑦 ⦌ ⦋ ( 2nd ‘ 𝑤 ) / 𝑧 ⦌ 𝑋 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑋 ) )
15 7 11 12 14 rexxpf ⊢ ( ∃ 𝑤 ∈ ( 𝐵 × 𝐶 ) 𝑥 = ⦋ ( 1st ‘ 𝑤 ) / 𝑦 ⦌ ⦋ ( 2nd ‘ 𝑤 ) / 𝑧 ⦌ 𝑋 ↔ ∃ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥 = 𝑋 )
16 4 15 sylibr ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ) → ∃ 𝑤 ∈ ( 𝐵 × 𝐶 ) 𝑥 = ⦋ ( 1st ‘ 𝑤 ) / 𝑦 ⦌ ⦋ ( 2nd ‘ 𝑤 ) / 𝑧 ⦌ 𝑋 )
17 1 5 16 wdom2d ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐴 ≼* ( 𝐵 × 𝐶 ) )