Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem wl-axc11rc11

Description: Proving axc11r from axc11 . The hypotheses are two instances of axc11 used in the proof here. Some systems introduce axc11 as an axiom, see for example System S2 in https://us.metamath.org/downloads/finiteaxiom.pdf .

By contrast, this database sees the variant axc11r , directly derived from ax-12 , as foundational. Later axc11 is proven somewhat trickily, requiring ax-10 and ax-13 , see its proof. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 18-Jul-2023)

Ref Expression
Hypotheses wl-axc11rc11.1 ( ∀ 𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥 → ( ∀ 𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥 → ∀ 𝑥 𝑦 = 𝑥 ) )
wl-axc11rc11.2 ( ∀ 𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ( ∀ 𝑥 𝜑 → ∀ 𝑦 𝜑 ) )
Assertion wl-axc11rc11 ( ∀ 𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥 → ( ∀ 𝑥 𝜑 → ∀ 𝑦 𝜑 ) )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 wl-axc11rc11.1 ( ∀ 𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥 → ( ∀ 𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥 → ∀ 𝑥 𝑦 = 𝑥 ) )
2 wl-axc11rc11.2 ( ∀ 𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ( ∀ 𝑥 𝜑 → ∀ 𝑦 𝜑 ) )
3 1 pm2.43i ( ∀ 𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥 → ∀ 𝑥 𝑦 = 𝑥 )
4 equcomi ( 𝑦 = 𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 )
5 4 alimi ( ∀ 𝑥 𝑦 = 𝑥 → ∀ 𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 )
6 3 5 2 3syl ( ∀ 𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥 → ( ∀ 𝑥 𝜑 → ∀ 𝑦 𝜑 ) )