Description: Characterization of the ordered pair elements of the identity relation.
Remark: in deduction-style proofs, one could save a few syntactic steps by using another antecedent than T. which already appears in the proof. Here for instance this could be the definition _I = { <. x , y >. | x = y } but this would make the proof less easy to read. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Dec-2023)
Ref | Expression | ||
---|---|---|---|
Assertion | bj-opelidb | |- ( <. A , B >. e. _I <-> ( ( A e. _V /\ B e. _V ) /\ A = B ) ) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | df-id | |- _I = { <. x , y >. | x = y } |
|
2 | 1 | a1i | |- ( T. -> _I = { <. x , y >. | x = y } ) |
3 | eqeq12 | |- ( ( x = A /\ y = B ) -> ( x = y <-> A = B ) ) |
|
4 | 3 | adantl | |- ( ( T. /\ ( x = A /\ y = B ) ) -> ( x = y <-> A = B ) ) |
5 | 2 4 | opelopabbv | |- ( T. -> ( <. A , B >. e. _I <-> ( ( A e. _V /\ B e. _V ) /\ A = B ) ) ) |
6 | 5 | mptru | |- ( <. A , B >. e. _I <-> ( ( A e. _V /\ B e. _V ) /\ A = B ) ) |