Description: Characterization of the ordered pair elements of the identity relation.
Remark: in deduction-style proofs, one could save a few syntactic steps by using another antecedent than T. which already appears in the proof. Here for instance this could be the definition _I = { <. x , y >. | x = y } but this would make the proof less easy to read. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Dec-2023)
Ref | Expression | ||
---|---|---|---|
Assertion | bj-opelidb | ⊢ ( 〈 𝐴 , 𝐵 〉 ∈ I ↔ ( ( 𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V ) ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ) ) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | df-id | ⊢ I = { 〈 𝑥 , 𝑦 〉 ∣ 𝑥 = 𝑦 } | |
2 | 1 | a1i | ⊢ ( ⊤ → I = { 〈 𝑥 , 𝑦 〉 ∣ 𝑥 = 𝑦 } ) |
3 | eqeq12 | ⊢ ( ( 𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵 ) → ( 𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ) ) | |
4 | 3 | adantl | ⊢ ( ( ⊤ ∧ ( 𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵 ) ) → ( 𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ) ) |
5 | 2 4 | opelopabbv | ⊢ ( ⊤ → ( 〈 𝐴 , 𝐵 〉 ∈ I ↔ ( ( 𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V ) ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ) ) ) |
6 | 5 | mptru | ⊢ ( 〈 𝐴 , 𝐵 〉 ∈ I ↔ ( ( 𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V ) ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ) ) |