Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem funcringcsetcALTV2lem2

Description: Lemma 2 for funcringcsetcALTV2 . (Contributed by AV, 15-Feb-2020) (New usage is discouraged.)

Ref Expression
Hypotheses funcringcsetcALTV2.r
|- R = ( RingCat ` U )
funcringcsetcALTV2.s
|- S = ( SetCat ` U )
funcringcsetcALTV2.b
|- B = ( Base ` R )
funcringcsetcALTV2.c
|- C = ( Base ` S )
funcringcsetcALTV2.u
|- ( ph -> U e. WUni )
funcringcsetcALTV2.f
|- ( ph -> F = ( x e. B |-> ( Base ` x ) ) )
Assertion funcringcsetcALTV2lem2
|- ( ( ph /\ X e. B ) -> ( F ` X ) e. U )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 funcringcsetcALTV2.r
 |-  R = ( RingCat ` U )
2 funcringcsetcALTV2.s
 |-  S = ( SetCat ` U )
3 funcringcsetcALTV2.b
 |-  B = ( Base ` R )
4 funcringcsetcALTV2.c
 |-  C = ( Base ` S )
5 funcringcsetcALTV2.u
 |-  ( ph -> U e. WUni )
6 funcringcsetcALTV2.f
 |-  ( ph -> F = ( x e. B |-> ( Base ` x ) ) )
7 1 2 3 4 5 6 funcringcsetcALTV2lem1
 |-  ( ( ph /\ X e. B ) -> ( F ` X ) = ( Base ` X ) )
8 1 3 5 ringcbasbas
 |-  ( ( ph /\ X e. B ) -> ( Base ` X ) e. U )
9 7 8 eqeltrd
 |-  ( ( ph /\ X e. B ) -> ( F ` X ) e. U )