Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem difrab

Description: Difference of two restricted class abstractions. (Contributed by NM, 23-Oct-2004)

Ref Expression
Assertion difrab ⊢ x ∈ A | φ ∖ x ∈ A | ψ = x ∈ A | φ ∧ ¬ ψ

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 df-rab ⊢ x ∈ A | φ = x | x ∈ A ∧ φ
2 df-rab ⊢ x ∈ A | ψ = x | x ∈ A ∧ ψ
3 1 2 difeq12i ⊢ x ∈ A | φ ∖ x ∈ A | ψ = x | x ∈ A ∧ φ ∖ x | x ∈ A ∧ ψ
4 df-rab ⊢ x ∈ A | φ ∧ ¬ ψ = x | x ∈ A ∧ φ ∧ ¬ ψ
5 difab ⊢ x | x ∈ A ∧ φ ∖ x | x ∈ A ∧ ψ = x | x ∈ A ∧ φ ∧ ¬ x ∈ A ∧ ψ
6 anass ⊢ x ∈ A ∧ φ ∧ ¬ ψ ↔ x ∈ A ∧ φ ∧ ¬ ψ
7 simpr ⊢ x ∈ A ∧ ψ → ψ
8 7 con3i ⊢ ¬ ψ → ¬ x ∈ A ∧ ψ
9 8 anim2i ⊢ x ∈ A ∧ φ ∧ ¬ ψ → x ∈ A ∧ φ ∧ ¬ x ∈ A ∧ ψ
10 pm3.2 ⊢ x ∈ A → ψ → x ∈ A ∧ ψ
11 10 adantr ⊢ x ∈ A ∧ φ → ψ → x ∈ A ∧ ψ
12 11 con3d ⊢ x ∈ A ∧ φ → ¬ x ∈ A ∧ ψ → ¬ ψ
13 12 imdistani ⊢ x ∈ A ∧ φ ∧ ¬ x ∈ A ∧ ψ → x ∈ A ∧ φ ∧ ¬ ψ
14 9 13 impbii ⊢ x ∈ A ∧ φ ∧ ¬ ψ ↔ x ∈ A ∧ φ ∧ ¬ x ∈ A ∧ ψ
15 6 14 bitr3i ⊢ x ∈ A ∧ φ ∧ ¬ ψ ↔ x ∈ A ∧ φ ∧ ¬ x ∈ A ∧ ψ
16 15 abbii ⊢ x | x ∈ A ∧ φ ∧ ¬ ψ = x | x ∈ A ∧ φ ∧ ¬ x ∈ A ∧ ψ
17 5 16 eqtr4i ⊢ x | x ∈ A ∧ φ ∖ x | x ∈ A ∧ ψ = x | x ∈ A ∧ φ ∧ ¬ ψ
18 4 17 eqtr4i ⊢ x ∈ A | φ ∧ ¬ ψ = x | x ∈ A ∧ φ ∖ x | x ∈ A ∧ ψ
19 3 18 eqtr4i ⊢ x ∈ A | φ ∖ x ∈ A | ψ = x ∈ A | φ ∧ ¬ ψ