Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem eleq1w

Description: Weaker version of eleq1 (but more general than elequ1 ) not depending on ax-ext nor df-cleq .

Note that this provides a proof of ax-8 from Tarski's FOL and dfclel (simply consider an instance where A is replaced by a setvar and deduce the forward implication by biimpd ), which shows that dfclel is too powerful to be used as a definition instead of df-clel . (Contributed by BJ, 24-Jun-2019)

Ref Expression
Assertion eleq1w ⊢ x = y → x ∈ A ↔ y ∈ A

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 equequ2 ⊢ x = y → z = x ↔ z = y
2 1 anbi1d ⊢ x = y → z = x ∧ z ∈ A ↔ z = y ∧ z ∈ A
3 2 exbidv ⊢ x = y → ∃ z z = x ∧ z ∈ A ↔ ∃ z z = y ∧ z ∈ A
4 dfclel ⊢ x ∈ A ↔ ∃ z z = x ∧ z ∈ A
5 dfclel ⊢ y ∈ A ↔ ∃ z z = y ∧ z ∈ A
6 3 4 5 3bitr4g ⊢ x = y → x ∈ A ↔ y ∈ A