Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem bnj581

Description: Technical lemma for bnj580 . This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011) Remove unnecessary distinct variable conditions. (Revised by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jul-2011) (New usage is discouraged.)

Ref Expression
Hypotheses bnj581.3 ( 𝜒 ↔ ( 𝑓 Fn 𝑛𝜑𝜓 ) )
bnj581.4 ( 𝜑′[ 𝑔 / 𝑓 ] 𝜑 )
bnj581.5 ( 𝜓′[ 𝑔 / 𝑓 ] 𝜓 )
bnj581.6 ( 𝜒′[ 𝑔 / 𝑓 ] 𝜒 )
Assertion bnj581 ( 𝜒′ ↔ ( 𝑔 Fn 𝑛𝜑′𝜓′ ) )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 bnj581.3 ( 𝜒 ↔ ( 𝑓 Fn 𝑛𝜑𝜓 ) )
2 bnj581.4 ( 𝜑′[ 𝑔 / 𝑓 ] 𝜑 )
3 bnj581.5 ( 𝜓′[ 𝑔 / 𝑓 ] 𝜓 )
4 bnj581.6 ( 𝜒′[ 𝑔 / 𝑓 ] 𝜒 )
5 1 sbcbii ( [ 𝑔 / 𝑓 ] 𝜒[ 𝑔 / 𝑓 ] ( 𝑓 Fn 𝑛𝜑𝜓 ) )
6 sbc3an ( [ 𝑔 / 𝑓 ] ( 𝑓 Fn 𝑛𝜑𝜓 ) ↔ ( [ 𝑔 / 𝑓 ] 𝑓 Fn 𝑛[ 𝑔 / 𝑓 ] 𝜑[ 𝑔 / 𝑓 ] 𝜓 ) )
7 bnj62 ( [ 𝑔 / 𝑓 ] 𝑓 Fn 𝑛𝑔 Fn 𝑛 )
8 7 bicomi ( 𝑔 Fn 𝑛[ 𝑔 / 𝑓 ] 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 )
9 8 2 3 3anbi123i ( ( 𝑔 Fn 𝑛𝜑′𝜓′ ) ↔ ( [ 𝑔 / 𝑓 ] 𝑓 Fn 𝑛[ 𝑔 / 𝑓 ] 𝜑[ 𝑔 / 𝑓 ] 𝜓 ) )
10 6 9 bitr4i ( [ 𝑔 / 𝑓 ] ( 𝑓 Fn 𝑛𝜑𝜓 ) ↔ ( 𝑔 Fn 𝑛𝜑′𝜓′ ) )
11 4 5 10 3bitri ( 𝜒′ ↔ ( 𝑔 Fn 𝑛𝜑′𝜓′ ) )