Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem fsumclf

Description: Closure of a finite sum of complex numbers A ( k ) . A version of fsumcl using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 5-Apr-2020)

Ref Expression
Hypotheses fsumclf.ph ⊢ Ⅎ 𝑘 𝜑
fsumclf.a ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin )
fsumclf.b ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 ) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ )
Assertion fsumclf ( 𝜑 → Σ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ ℂ )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 fsumclf.ph ⊢ Ⅎ 𝑘 𝜑
2 fsumclf.a ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin )
3 fsumclf.b ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 ) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ )
4 csbeq1a ⊢ ( 𝑘 = 𝑗 → 𝐵 = ⦋ 𝑗 / 𝑘 ⦌ 𝐵 )
5 nfcv ⊢ Ⅎ 𝑗 𝐵
6 nfcsb1v ⊢ Ⅎ 𝑘 ⦋ 𝑗 / 𝑘 ⦌ 𝐵
7 4 5 6 cbvsum ⊢ Σ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = Σ 𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 ⦋ 𝑗 / 𝑘 ⦌ 𝐵
8 7 a1i ⊢ ( 𝜑 → Σ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = Σ 𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 ⦋ 𝑗 / 𝑘 ⦌ 𝐵 )
9 nfv ⊢ Ⅎ 𝑘 𝑗 ∈ 𝐴
10 1 9 nfan ⊢ Ⅎ 𝑘 ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 )
11 6 nfel1 ⊢ Ⅎ 𝑘 ⦋ 𝑗 / 𝑘 ⦌ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ
12 10 11 nfim ⊢ Ⅎ 𝑘 ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 ) → ⦋ 𝑗 / 𝑘 ⦌ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ )
13 eleq1w ⊢ ( 𝑘 = 𝑗 → ( 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 ) )
14 13 anbi2d ⊢ ( 𝑘 = 𝑗 → ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 ) ↔ ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 ) ) )
15 4 eleq1d ⊢ ( 𝑘 = 𝑗 → ( 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ↔ ⦋ 𝑗 / 𝑘 ⦌ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ) )
16 14 15 imbi12d ⊢ ( 𝑘 = 𝑗 → ( ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 ) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ) ↔ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 ) → ⦋ 𝑗 / 𝑘 ⦌ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ) ) )
17 12 16 3 chvarfv ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 ) → ⦋ 𝑗 / 𝑘 ⦌ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ )
18 2 17 fsumcl ⊢ ( 𝜑 → Σ 𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 ⦋ 𝑗 / 𝑘 ⦌ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ )
19 8 18 eqeltrd ⊢ ( 𝜑 → Σ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ ℂ )