Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem imadomnum

Description: A version of imadomg that does not require the axiom of choice ax-ac . (Contributed by Vincent Gonzalez, 25-Aug-2026)

Ref Expression
Assertion imadomnum ( 𝐴 ∈ dom card → ( Fun 𝐹 → ( 𝐹𝐴 ) ≼ 𝐴 ) )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 df-ima ( 𝐹𝐴 ) = ran ( 𝐹𝐴 )
2 inss1 ( 𝐴 ∩ dom 𝐹 ) ⊆ 𝐴
3 ssnum ( ( 𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ ( 𝐴 ∩ dom 𝐹 ) ⊆ 𝐴 ) → ( 𝐴 ∩ dom 𝐹 ) ∈ dom card )
4 2 3 mpan2 ( 𝐴 ∈ dom card → ( 𝐴 ∩ dom 𝐹 ) ∈ dom card )
5 4 adantr ( ( 𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ Fun 𝐹 ) → ( 𝐴 ∩ dom 𝐹 ) ∈ dom card )
6 funres ( Fun 𝐹 → Fun ( 𝐹𝐴 ) )
7 funfn ( Fun ( 𝐹𝐴 ) ↔ ( 𝐹𝐴 ) Fn dom ( 𝐹𝐴 ) )
8 6 7 sylib ( Fun 𝐹 → ( 𝐹𝐴 ) Fn dom ( 𝐹𝐴 ) )
9 dmres dom ( 𝐹𝐴 ) = ( 𝐴 ∩ dom 𝐹 )
10 9 fneq2i ( ( 𝐹𝐴 ) Fn dom ( 𝐹𝐴 ) ↔ ( 𝐹𝐴 ) Fn ( 𝐴 ∩ dom 𝐹 ) )
11 8 10 sylib ( Fun 𝐹 → ( 𝐹𝐴 ) Fn ( 𝐴 ∩ dom 𝐹 ) )
12 11 adantl ( ( 𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ Fun 𝐹 ) → ( 𝐹𝐴 ) Fn ( 𝐴 ∩ dom 𝐹 ) )
13 dffn4 ( ( 𝐹𝐴 ) Fn ( 𝐴 ∩ dom 𝐹 ) ↔ ( 𝐹𝐴 ) : ( 𝐴 ∩ dom 𝐹 ) –onto→ ran ( 𝐹𝐴 ) )
14 fodomnum ( ( 𝐴 ∩ dom 𝐹 ) ∈ dom card → ( ( 𝐹𝐴 ) : ( 𝐴 ∩ dom 𝐹 ) –onto→ ran ( 𝐹𝐴 ) → ran ( 𝐹𝐴 ) ≼ ( 𝐴 ∩ dom 𝐹 ) ) )
15 13 14 biimtrid ( ( 𝐴 ∩ dom 𝐹 ) ∈ dom card → ( ( 𝐹𝐴 ) Fn ( 𝐴 ∩ dom 𝐹 ) → ran ( 𝐹𝐴 ) ≼ ( 𝐴 ∩ dom 𝐹 ) ) )
16 5 12 15 sylc ( ( 𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ Fun 𝐹 ) → ran ( 𝐹𝐴 ) ≼ ( 𝐴 ∩ dom 𝐹 ) )
17 1 16 eqbrtrid ( ( 𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ Fun 𝐹 ) → ( 𝐹𝐴 ) ≼ ( 𝐴 ∩ dom 𝐹 ) )
18 elex ( 𝐴 ∈ dom card → 𝐴 ∈ V )
19 ssdomg ( 𝐴 ∈ V → ( ( 𝐴 ∩ dom 𝐹 ) ⊆ 𝐴 → ( 𝐴 ∩ dom 𝐹 ) ≼ 𝐴 ) )
20 18 19 syl ( 𝐴 ∈ dom card → ( ( 𝐴 ∩ dom 𝐹 ) ⊆ 𝐴 → ( 𝐴 ∩ dom 𝐹 ) ≼ 𝐴 ) )
21 2 20 mpi ( 𝐴 ∈ dom card → ( 𝐴 ∩ dom 𝐹 ) ≼ 𝐴 )
22 21 adantr ( ( 𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ Fun 𝐹 ) → ( 𝐴 ∩ dom 𝐹 ) ≼ 𝐴 )
23 domtr ( ( ( 𝐹𝐴 ) ≼ ( 𝐴 ∩ dom 𝐹 ) ∧ ( 𝐴 ∩ dom 𝐹 ) ≼ 𝐴 ) → ( 𝐹𝐴 ) ≼ 𝐴 )
24 17 22 23 syl2anc ( ( 𝐴 ∈ dom card ∧ Fun 𝐹 ) → ( 𝐹𝐴 ) ≼ 𝐴 )
25 24 ex ( 𝐴 ∈ dom card → ( Fun 𝐹 → ( 𝐹𝐴 ) ≼ 𝐴 ) )