Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem prlnginn0

Description: A line C intersecting another line A also intersects any line B parallel to A . Theorem 12.16 of Schwabhauser p. 125. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Jul-2026)

Ref Expression
Hypotheses prlnginn0.l 𝐿 = ( LineG ‘ 𝐺 )
prlnginn0.e 𝐸 = ( hlG ‘ 𝐺 )
prlnginn0.p = ( parlnG ‘ 𝐺 )
prlnginn0.g ( 𝜑𝐺 ∈ TarskiG )
prlnginn0.1 ( 𝜑𝐺 ∈ TarskiGE )
prlnginn0.h ( 𝜑𝐻 ∈ ran 𝐸 )
prlnginn0.c ( 𝜑𝐶 ∈ ran 𝐿 )
prlnginn0.2 ( 𝜑 → ( 𝐴𝐶 ) ≠ ∅ )
prlnginn0.3 ( 𝜑𝐴𝐶 )
prlnginn0.4 ( 𝜑𝐴 𝐵 )
prlnginn0.5 ( 𝜑𝐴𝐻 )
prlnginn0.6 ( 𝜑𝐵𝐻 )
prlnginn0.7 ( 𝜑𝐶𝐻 )
Assertion prlnginn0 ( 𝜑 → ( 𝐵𝐶 ) ≠ ∅ )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 prlnginn0.l 𝐿 = ( LineG ‘ 𝐺 )
2 prlnginn0.e 𝐸 = ( hlG ‘ 𝐺 )
3 prlnginn0.p = ( parlnG ‘ 𝐺 )
4 prlnginn0.g ( 𝜑𝐺 ∈ TarskiG )
5 prlnginn0.1 ( 𝜑𝐺 ∈ TarskiGE )
6 prlnginn0.h ( 𝜑𝐻 ∈ ran 𝐸 )
7 prlnginn0.c ( 𝜑𝐶 ∈ ran 𝐿 )
8 prlnginn0.2 ( 𝜑 → ( 𝐴𝐶 ) ≠ ∅ )
9 prlnginn0.3 ( 𝜑𝐴𝐶 )
10 prlnginn0.4 ( 𝜑𝐴 𝐵 )
11 prlnginn0.5 ( 𝜑𝐴𝐻 )
12 prlnginn0.6 ( 𝜑𝐵𝐻 )
13 prlnginn0.7 ( 𝜑𝐶𝐻 )
14 8 neneqd ( 𝜑 → ¬ ( 𝐴𝐶 ) = ∅ )
15 4 adantr ( ( 𝜑𝐴 𝐶 ) → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG )
16 simpr ( ( 𝜑𝐴 𝐶 ) → 𝐴 𝐶 )
17 9 adantr ( ( 𝜑𝐴 𝐶 ) → 𝐴𝐶 )
18 1 3 15 16 17 prlngin0 ( ( 𝜑𝐴 𝐶 ) → ( 𝐴𝐶 ) = ∅ )
19 14 18 mtand ( 𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 𝐶 )
20 4 adantr ( ( 𝜑𝐵 𝐶 ) → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG )
21 6 adantr ( ( 𝜑𝐵 𝐶 ) → 𝐻 ∈ ran 𝐸 )
22 11 adantr ( ( 𝜑𝐵 𝐶 ) → 𝐴𝐻 )
23 10 adantr ( ( 𝜑𝐵 𝐶 ) → 𝐴 𝐵 )
24 5 adantr ( ( 𝜑𝐵 𝐶 ) → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiGE )
25 13 adantr ( ( 𝜑𝐵 𝐶 ) → 𝐶𝐻 )
26 simpr ( ( 𝜑𝐵 𝐶 ) → 𝐵 𝐶 )
27 2 3 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 prlngplngtr ( ( 𝜑𝐵 𝐶 ) → 𝐴 𝐶 )
28 19 27 mtand ( 𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 𝐶 )
29 4 adantr ( ( 𝜑 ∧ ( 𝐵𝐶 ) = ∅ ) → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG )
30 1 3 4 10 prlngrcl2 ( 𝜑𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐿 )
31 30 adantr ( ( 𝜑 ∧ ( 𝐵𝐶 ) = ∅ ) → 𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐿 )
32 7 adantr ( ( 𝜑 ∧ ( 𝐵𝐶 ) = ∅ ) → 𝐶 ∈ ran 𝐿 )
33 6 adantr ( ( 𝜑 ∧ ( 𝐵𝐶 ) = ∅ ) → 𝐻 ∈ ran 𝐸 )
34 12 adantr ( ( 𝜑 ∧ ( 𝐵𝐶 ) = ∅ ) → 𝐵𝐻 )
35 13 adantr ( ( 𝜑 ∧ ( 𝐵𝐶 ) = ∅ ) → 𝐶𝐻 )
36 simpr ( ( 𝜑 ∧ ( 𝐵𝐶 ) = ∅ ) → ( 𝐵𝐶 ) = ∅ )
37 1 2 3 29 31 32 33 34 35 36 prlngd ( ( 𝜑 ∧ ( 𝐵𝐶 ) = ∅ ) → 𝐵 𝐶 )
38 28 37 mtand ( 𝜑 → ¬ ( 𝐵𝐶 ) = ∅ )
39 38 neqned ( 𝜑 → ( 𝐵𝐶 ) ≠ ∅ )