Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem tglng

Description: Lines of a Tarski Geometry. This relates to both Definition 4.10 of Schwabhauser p. 36. and Definition 6.14 of Schwabhauser p. 45. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Mar-2019)

Ref Expression
Hypotheses tglng.p 𝑃 = ( Base ‘ 𝐺 )
tglng.l 𝐿 = ( LineG ‘ 𝐺 )
tglng.i 𝐼 = ( Itv ‘ 𝐺 )
Assertion tglng ( 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG → 𝐿 = ( 𝑥𝑃 , 𝑦 ∈ ( 𝑃 ∖ { 𝑥 } ) ↦ { 𝑧𝑃 ∣ ( 𝑧 ∈ ( 𝑥 𝐼 𝑦 ) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ ( 𝑧 𝐼 𝑦 ) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ ( 𝑥 𝐼 𝑧 ) ) } ) )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 tglng.p 𝑃 = ( Base ‘ 𝐺 )
2 tglng.l 𝐿 = ( LineG ‘ 𝐺 )
3 tglng.i 𝐼 = ( Itv ‘ 𝐺 )
4 df-trkg TarskiG = ( ( TarskiGC ∩ TarskiGB ) ∩ ( TarskiGCB ∩ { 𝑓[ ( Base ‘ 𝑓 ) / 𝑝 ] [ ( Itv ‘ 𝑓 ) / 𝑖 ] ( LineG ‘ 𝑓 ) = ( 𝑥𝑝 , 𝑦 ∈ ( 𝑝 ∖ { 𝑥 } ) ↦ { 𝑧𝑝 ∣ ( 𝑧 ∈ ( 𝑥 𝑖 𝑦 ) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ ( 𝑧 𝑖 𝑦 ) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ ( 𝑥 𝑖 𝑧 ) ) } ) } ) )
5 inss2 ( ( TarskiGC ∩ TarskiGB ) ∩ ( TarskiGCB ∩ { 𝑓[ ( Base ‘ 𝑓 ) / 𝑝 ] [ ( Itv ‘ 𝑓 ) / 𝑖 ] ( LineG ‘ 𝑓 ) = ( 𝑥𝑝 , 𝑦 ∈ ( 𝑝 ∖ { 𝑥 } ) ↦ { 𝑧𝑝 ∣ ( 𝑧 ∈ ( 𝑥 𝑖 𝑦 ) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ ( 𝑧 𝑖 𝑦 ) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ ( 𝑥 𝑖 𝑧 ) ) } ) } ) ) ⊆ ( TarskiGCB ∩ { 𝑓[ ( Base ‘ 𝑓 ) / 𝑝 ] [ ( Itv ‘ 𝑓 ) / 𝑖 ] ( LineG ‘ 𝑓 ) = ( 𝑥𝑝 , 𝑦 ∈ ( 𝑝 ∖ { 𝑥 } ) ↦ { 𝑧𝑝 ∣ ( 𝑧 ∈ ( 𝑥 𝑖 𝑦 ) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ ( 𝑧 𝑖 𝑦 ) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ ( 𝑥 𝑖 𝑧 ) ) } ) } )
6 inss2 ( TarskiGCB ∩ { 𝑓[ ( Base ‘ 𝑓 ) / 𝑝 ] [ ( Itv ‘ 𝑓 ) / 𝑖 ] ( LineG ‘ 𝑓 ) = ( 𝑥𝑝 , 𝑦 ∈ ( 𝑝 ∖ { 𝑥 } ) ↦ { 𝑧𝑝 ∣ ( 𝑧 ∈ ( 𝑥 𝑖 𝑦 ) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ ( 𝑧 𝑖 𝑦 ) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ ( 𝑥 𝑖 𝑧 ) ) } ) } ) ⊆ { 𝑓[ ( Base ‘ 𝑓 ) / 𝑝 ] [ ( Itv ‘ 𝑓 ) / 𝑖 ] ( LineG ‘ 𝑓 ) = ( 𝑥𝑝 , 𝑦 ∈ ( 𝑝 ∖ { 𝑥 } ) ↦ { 𝑧𝑝 ∣ ( 𝑧 ∈ ( 𝑥 𝑖 𝑦 ) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ ( 𝑧 𝑖 𝑦 ) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ ( 𝑥 𝑖 𝑧 ) ) } ) }
7 5 6 sstri ( ( TarskiGC ∩ TarskiGB ) ∩ ( TarskiGCB ∩ { 𝑓[ ( Base ‘ 𝑓 ) / 𝑝 ] [ ( Itv ‘ 𝑓 ) / 𝑖 ] ( LineG ‘ 𝑓 ) = ( 𝑥𝑝 , 𝑦 ∈ ( 𝑝 ∖ { 𝑥 } ) ↦ { 𝑧𝑝 ∣ ( 𝑧 ∈ ( 𝑥 𝑖 𝑦 ) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ ( 𝑧 𝑖 𝑦 ) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ ( 𝑥 𝑖 𝑧 ) ) } ) } ) ) ⊆ { 𝑓[ ( Base ‘ 𝑓 ) / 𝑝 ] [ ( Itv ‘ 𝑓 ) / 𝑖 ] ( LineG ‘ 𝑓 ) = ( 𝑥𝑝 , 𝑦 ∈ ( 𝑝 ∖ { 𝑥 } ) ↦ { 𝑧𝑝 ∣ ( 𝑧 ∈ ( 𝑥 𝑖 𝑦 ) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ ( 𝑧 𝑖 𝑦 ) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ ( 𝑥 𝑖 𝑧 ) ) } ) }
8 4 7 eqsstri TarskiG ⊆ { 𝑓[ ( Base ‘ 𝑓 ) / 𝑝 ] [ ( Itv ‘ 𝑓 ) / 𝑖 ] ( LineG ‘ 𝑓 ) = ( 𝑥𝑝 , 𝑦 ∈ ( 𝑝 ∖ { 𝑥 } ) ↦ { 𝑧𝑝 ∣ ( 𝑧 ∈ ( 𝑥 𝑖 𝑦 ) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ ( 𝑧 𝑖 𝑦 ) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ ( 𝑥 𝑖 𝑧 ) ) } ) }
9 8 sseli ( 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG → 𝐺 ∈ { 𝑓[ ( Base ‘ 𝑓 ) / 𝑝 ] [ ( Itv ‘ 𝑓 ) / 𝑖 ] ( LineG ‘ 𝑓 ) = ( 𝑥𝑝 , 𝑦 ∈ ( 𝑝 ∖ { 𝑥 } ) ↦ { 𝑧𝑝 ∣ ( 𝑧 ∈ ( 𝑥 𝑖 𝑦 ) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ ( 𝑧 𝑖 𝑦 ) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ ( 𝑥 𝑖 𝑧 ) ) } ) } )
10 eqid ( dist ‘ 𝐺 ) = ( dist ‘ 𝐺 )
11 1 10 3 istrkgl ( 𝐺 ∈ { 𝑓[ ( Base ‘ 𝑓 ) / 𝑝 ] [ ( Itv ‘ 𝑓 ) / 𝑖 ] ( LineG ‘ 𝑓 ) = ( 𝑥𝑝 , 𝑦 ∈ ( 𝑝 ∖ { 𝑥 } ) ↦ { 𝑧𝑝 ∣ ( 𝑧 ∈ ( 𝑥 𝑖 𝑦 ) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ ( 𝑧 𝑖 𝑦 ) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ ( 𝑥 𝑖 𝑧 ) ) } ) } ↔ ( 𝐺 ∈ V ∧ ( LineG ‘ 𝐺 ) = ( 𝑥𝑃 , 𝑦 ∈ ( 𝑃 ∖ { 𝑥 } ) ↦ { 𝑧𝑃 ∣ ( 𝑧 ∈ ( 𝑥 𝐼 𝑦 ) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ ( 𝑧 𝐼 𝑦 ) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ ( 𝑥 𝐼 𝑧 ) ) } ) ) )
12 11 simprbi ( 𝐺 ∈ { 𝑓[ ( Base ‘ 𝑓 ) / 𝑝 ] [ ( Itv ‘ 𝑓 ) / 𝑖 ] ( LineG ‘ 𝑓 ) = ( 𝑥𝑝 , 𝑦 ∈ ( 𝑝 ∖ { 𝑥 } ) ↦ { 𝑧𝑝 ∣ ( 𝑧 ∈ ( 𝑥 𝑖 𝑦 ) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ ( 𝑧 𝑖 𝑦 ) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ ( 𝑥 𝑖 𝑧 ) ) } ) } → ( LineG ‘ 𝐺 ) = ( 𝑥𝑃 , 𝑦 ∈ ( 𝑃 ∖ { 𝑥 } ) ↦ { 𝑧𝑃 ∣ ( 𝑧 ∈ ( 𝑥 𝐼 𝑦 ) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ ( 𝑧 𝐼 𝑦 ) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ ( 𝑥 𝐼 𝑧 ) ) } ) )
13 2 12 eqtrid ( 𝐺 ∈ { 𝑓[ ( Base ‘ 𝑓 ) / 𝑝 ] [ ( Itv ‘ 𝑓 ) / 𝑖 ] ( LineG ‘ 𝑓 ) = ( 𝑥𝑝 , 𝑦 ∈ ( 𝑝 ∖ { 𝑥 } ) ↦ { 𝑧𝑝 ∣ ( 𝑧 ∈ ( 𝑥 𝑖 𝑦 ) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ ( 𝑧 𝑖 𝑦 ) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ ( 𝑥 𝑖 𝑧 ) ) } ) } → 𝐿 = ( 𝑥𝑃 , 𝑦 ∈ ( 𝑃 ∖ { 𝑥 } ) ↦ { 𝑧𝑃 ∣ ( 𝑧 ∈ ( 𝑥 𝐼 𝑦 ) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ ( 𝑧 𝐼 𝑦 ) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ ( 𝑥 𝐼 𝑧 ) ) } ) )
14 9 13 syl ( 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG → 𝐿 = ( 𝑥𝑃 , 𝑦 ∈ ( 𝑃 ∖ { 𝑥 } ) ↦ { 𝑧𝑃 ∣ ( 𝑧 ∈ ( 𝑥 𝐼 𝑦 ) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ ( 𝑧 𝐼 𝑦 ) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ ( 𝑥 𝐼 𝑧 ) ) } ) )