Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem bnj556

Description: Technical lemma for bnj852 . This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011) (New usage is discouraged.)

Ref Expression
Hypotheses bnj556.18 ⊢ σ ↔ m ∈ D ∧ n = suc ⁡ m ∧ p ∈ m
bnj556.19 ⊢ η ↔ m ∈ D ∧ n = suc ⁡ m ∧ p ∈ ω ∧ m = suc ⁡ p
Assertion bnj556 ⊢ η → σ

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 bnj556.18 ⊢ σ ↔ m ∈ D ∧ n = suc ⁡ m ∧ p ∈ m
2 bnj556.19 ⊢ η ↔ m ∈ D ∧ n = suc ⁡ m ∧ p ∈ ω ∧ m = suc ⁡ p
3 vex ⊢ p ∈ V
4 3 bnj216 ⊢ m = suc ⁡ p → p ∈ m
5 4 3anim3i ⊢ m ∈ D ∧ n = suc ⁡ m ∧ m = suc ⁡ p → m ∈ D ∧ n = suc ⁡ m ∧ p ∈ m
6 5 adantr ⊢ m ∈ D ∧ n = suc ⁡ m ∧ m = suc ⁡ p ∧ p ∈ ω → m ∈ D ∧ n = suc ⁡ m ∧ p ∈ m
7 bnj258 ⊢ m ∈ D ∧ n = suc ⁡ m ∧ p ∈ ω ∧ m = suc ⁡ p ↔ m ∈ D ∧ n = suc ⁡ m ∧ m = suc ⁡ p ∧ p ∈ ω
8 2 7 bitri ⊢ η ↔ m ∈ D ∧ n = suc ⁡ m ∧ m = suc ⁡ p ∧ p ∈ ω
9 6 8 1 3imtr4i ⊢ η → σ