Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem expnass

Description: A counterexample showing that exponentiation is not associative. (Contributed by Stefan Allan and Gérard Lang, 21-Sep-2010)

Ref Expression
Assertion expnass ⊢ 3 3 3 < 3 3 3

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 3cn ⊢ 3 ∈ ℂ
2 3nn0 ⊢ 3 ∈ ℕ 0
3 expmul ⊢ 3 ∈ ℂ ∧ 3 ∈ ℕ 0 ∧ 3 ∈ ℕ 0 → 3 3 ⋅ 3 = 3 3 3
4 1 2 2 3 mp3an ⊢ 3 3 ⋅ 3 = 3 3 3
5 3re ⊢ 3 ∈ ℝ
6 2 2 nn0mulcli ⊢ 3 ⋅ 3 ∈ ℕ 0
7 6 nn0zi ⊢ 3 ⋅ 3 ∈ ℤ
8 2 2 nn0expcli ⊢ 3 3 ∈ ℕ 0
9 8 nn0zi ⊢ 3 3 ∈ ℤ
10 1lt3 ⊢ 1 < 3
11 1 sqvali ⊢ 3 2 = 3 ⋅ 3
12 2z ⊢ 2 ∈ ℤ
13 3z ⊢ 3 ∈ ℤ
14 2lt3 ⊢ 2 < 3
15 ltexp2a ⊢ 3 ∈ ℝ ∧ 2 ∈ ℤ ∧ 3 ∈ ℤ ∧ 1 < 3 ∧ 2 < 3 → 3 2 < 3 3
16 10 14 15 mpanr12 ⊢ 3 ∈ ℝ ∧ 2 ∈ ℤ ∧ 3 ∈ ℤ → 3 2 < 3 3
17 5 12 13 16 mp3an ⊢ 3 2 < 3 3
18 11 17 eqbrtrri ⊢ 3 ⋅ 3 < 3 3
19 ltexp2a ⊢ 3 ∈ ℝ ∧ 3 ⋅ 3 ∈ ℤ ∧ 3 3 ∈ ℤ ∧ 1 < 3 ∧ 3 ⋅ 3 < 3 3 → 3 3 ⋅ 3 < 3 3 3
20 10 18 19 mpanr12 ⊢ 3 ∈ ℝ ∧ 3 ⋅ 3 ∈ ℤ ∧ 3 3 ∈ ℤ → 3 3 ⋅ 3 < 3 3 3
21 5 7 9 20 mp3an ⊢ 3 3 ⋅ 3 < 3 3 3
22 4 21 eqbrtrri ⊢ 3 3 3 < 3 3 3