Description: Lemma for pexmidN . Holland's proof implicitly requires q =/= r , which we prove here. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2012) (New usage is discouraged.)
Ref | Expression | ||
---|---|---|---|
Hypotheses | pexmidlem.l | |
|
pexmidlem.j | |
||
pexmidlem.a | |
||
pexmidlem.p | |
||
pexmidlem.o | |
||
pexmidlem.m | |
||
Assertion | pexmidlem1N | |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | pexmidlem.l | |
|
2 | pexmidlem.j | |
|
3 | pexmidlem.a | |
|
4 | pexmidlem.p | |
|
5 | pexmidlem.o | |
|
6 | pexmidlem.m | |
|
7 | n0i | |
|
8 | 3 5 | pnonsingN | |
9 | 8 | adantr | |
10 | 7 9 | nsyl3 | |
11 | simprr | |
|
12 | eleq1w | |
|
13 | 11 12 | syl5ibcom | |
14 | simprl | |
|
15 | 13 14 | jctild | |
16 | elin | |
|
17 | 15 16 | syl6ibr | |
18 | 17 | necon3bd | |
19 | 10 18 | mpd | |