Description: An unused lemma showing that many equivalences involving df-iota are potentially provable without ax-10 , ax-11 , ax-12 . (Contributed by SN, 6-Nov-2024)
Ref | Expression | ||
---|---|---|---|
Assertion | sn-iotalem | |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | eqeq1 | |
|
2 | sneqbg | |
|
3 | 2 | elv | |
4 | equcom | |
|
5 | 3 4 | bitri | |
6 | 1 5 | bitrdi | |
7 | sneq | |
|
8 | 7 | eqeq2d | |
9 | 8 | elabg | |
10 | 9 | elv | |
11 | velsn | |
|
12 | 6 10 11 | 3bitr4g | |
13 | 12 | eqrdv | |
14 | vsnid | |
|
15 | eleq2 | |
|
16 | 14 15 | mpbiri | |
17 | sneq | |
|
18 | 17 | eqeq2d | |
19 | 18 | elabg | |
20 | 19 | elv | |
21 | 16 20 | sylib | |
22 | 13 21 | impbii | |
23 | sneq | |
|
24 | 23 | eqeq2d | |
25 | 24 | elabg | |
26 | 25 | elv | |
27 | 22 20 26 | 3bitr4i | |
28 | 27 | eqriv | |