Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem ac10ct

Description: A proof of the well-ordering theorem weth , an Axiom of Choice equivalent, restricted to sets dominated by some ordinal (in particular finite sets and countable sets), proven in ZF without AC. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2013)

Ref Expression
Assertion ac10ct ( ∃ 𝑦 ∈ On 𝐴𝑦 → ∃ 𝑥 𝑥 We 𝐴 )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 vex 𝑦 ∈ V
2 1 brdom ( 𝐴𝑦 ↔ ∃ 𝑓 𝑓 : 𝐴1-1𝑦 )
3 onss ( 𝑦 ∈ On → 𝑦 ⊆ On )
4 3 a1i ( 𝑓 : 𝐴1-1𝑦 → ( 𝑦 ∈ On → 𝑦 ⊆ On ) )
5 epweon E We On
6 wess ( 𝑦 ⊆ On → ( E We On → E We 𝑦 ) )
7 4 5 6 syl6mpi ( 𝑓 : 𝐴1-1𝑦 → ( 𝑦 ∈ On → E We 𝑦 ) )
8 7 adantl ( ( 𝐴𝑦𝑓 : 𝐴1-1𝑦 ) → ( 𝑦 ∈ On → E We 𝑦 ) )
9 eqid { ⟨ 𝑤 , 𝑧 ⟩ ∣ ( 𝑓𝑤 ) E ( 𝑓𝑧 ) } = { ⟨ 𝑤 , 𝑧 ⟩ ∣ ( 𝑓𝑤 ) E ( 𝑓𝑧 ) }
10 9 f1we ( 𝑓 : 𝐴1-1𝑦 → ( E We 𝑦 → { ⟨ 𝑤 , 𝑧 ⟩ ∣ ( 𝑓𝑤 ) E ( 𝑓𝑧 ) } We 𝐴 ) )
11 weinxp ( { ⟨ 𝑤 , 𝑧 ⟩ ∣ ( 𝑓𝑤 ) E ( 𝑓𝑧 ) } We 𝐴 ↔ ( { ⟨ 𝑤 , 𝑧 ⟩ ∣ ( 𝑓𝑤 ) E ( 𝑓𝑧 ) } ∩ ( 𝐴 × 𝐴 ) ) We 𝐴 )
12 reldom Rel ≼
13 12 brrelex1i ( 𝐴𝑦𝐴 ∈ V )
14 sqxpexg ( 𝐴 ∈ V → ( 𝐴 × 𝐴 ) ∈ V )
15 inex2g ( ( 𝐴 × 𝐴 ) ∈ V → ( { ⟨ 𝑤 , 𝑧 ⟩ ∣ ( 𝑓𝑤 ) E ( 𝑓𝑧 ) } ∩ ( 𝐴 × 𝐴 ) ) ∈ V )
16 weeq1 ( 𝑥 = ( { ⟨ 𝑤 , 𝑧 ⟩ ∣ ( 𝑓𝑤 ) E ( 𝑓𝑧 ) } ∩ ( 𝐴 × 𝐴 ) ) → ( 𝑥 We 𝐴 ↔ ( { ⟨ 𝑤 , 𝑧 ⟩ ∣ ( 𝑓𝑤 ) E ( 𝑓𝑧 ) } ∩ ( 𝐴 × 𝐴 ) ) We 𝐴 ) )
17 16 spcegv ( ( { ⟨ 𝑤 , 𝑧 ⟩ ∣ ( 𝑓𝑤 ) E ( 𝑓𝑧 ) } ∩ ( 𝐴 × 𝐴 ) ) ∈ V → ( ( { ⟨ 𝑤 , 𝑧 ⟩ ∣ ( 𝑓𝑤 ) E ( 𝑓𝑧 ) } ∩ ( 𝐴 × 𝐴 ) ) We 𝐴 → ∃ 𝑥 𝑥 We 𝐴 ) )
18 13 14 15 17 4syl ( 𝐴𝑦 → ( ( { ⟨ 𝑤 , 𝑧 ⟩ ∣ ( 𝑓𝑤 ) E ( 𝑓𝑧 ) } ∩ ( 𝐴 × 𝐴 ) ) We 𝐴 → ∃ 𝑥 𝑥 We 𝐴 ) )
19 11 18 biimtrid ( 𝐴𝑦 → ( { ⟨ 𝑤 , 𝑧 ⟩ ∣ ( 𝑓𝑤 ) E ( 𝑓𝑧 ) } We 𝐴 → ∃ 𝑥 𝑥 We 𝐴 ) )
20 10 19 sylan9r ( ( 𝐴𝑦𝑓 : 𝐴1-1𝑦 ) → ( E We 𝑦 → ∃ 𝑥 𝑥 We 𝐴 ) )
21 8 20 syld ( ( 𝐴𝑦𝑓 : 𝐴1-1𝑦 ) → ( 𝑦 ∈ On → ∃ 𝑥 𝑥 We 𝐴 ) )
22 21 impancom ( ( 𝐴𝑦𝑦 ∈ On ) → ( 𝑓 : 𝐴1-1𝑦 → ∃ 𝑥 𝑥 We 𝐴 ) )
23 22 exlimdv ( ( 𝐴𝑦𝑦 ∈ On ) → ( ∃ 𝑓 𝑓 : 𝐴1-1𝑦 → ∃ 𝑥 𝑥 We 𝐴 ) )
24 2 23 biimtrid ( ( 𝐴𝑦𝑦 ∈ On ) → ( 𝐴𝑦 → ∃ 𝑥 𝑥 We 𝐴 ) )
25 24 ex ( 𝐴𝑦 → ( 𝑦 ∈ On → ( 𝐴𝑦 → ∃ 𝑥 𝑥 We 𝐴 ) ) )
26 25 pm2.43b ( 𝑦 ∈ On → ( 𝐴𝑦 → ∃ 𝑥 𝑥 We 𝐴 ) )
27 26 rexlimiv ( ∃ 𝑦 ∈ On 𝐴𝑦 → ∃ 𝑥 𝑥 We 𝐴 )