Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem axextdist

Description: ax-ext with distinctors instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Dec-2010)

Ref Expression
Assertion axextdist ( ( ¬ ∀ 𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑥 ∧ ¬ ∀ 𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦 ) → ( ∀ 𝑧 ( 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ) → 𝑥 = 𝑦 ) )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 nfnae ⊢ Ⅎ 𝑧 ¬ ∀ 𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑥
2 nfnae ⊢ Ⅎ 𝑧 ¬ ∀ 𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦
3 1 2 nfan ⊢ Ⅎ 𝑧 ( ¬ ∀ 𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑥 ∧ ¬ ∀ 𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦 )
4 nfcvf ⊢ ( ¬ ∀ 𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑥 → Ⅎ 𝑧 𝑥 )
5 4 adantr ⊢ ( ( ¬ ∀ 𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑥 ∧ ¬ ∀ 𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦 ) → Ⅎ 𝑧 𝑥 )
6 5 nfcrd ⊢ ( ( ¬ ∀ 𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑥 ∧ ¬ ∀ 𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦 ) → Ⅎ 𝑧 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 )
7 nfcvf ⊢ ( ¬ ∀ 𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦 → Ⅎ 𝑧 𝑦 )
8 7 adantl ⊢ ( ( ¬ ∀ 𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑥 ∧ ¬ ∀ 𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦 ) → Ⅎ 𝑧 𝑦 )
9 8 nfcrd ⊢ ( ( ¬ ∀ 𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑥 ∧ ¬ ∀ 𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦 ) → Ⅎ 𝑧 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 )
10 6 9 nfbid ⊢ ( ( ¬ ∀ 𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑥 ∧ ¬ ∀ 𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦 ) → Ⅎ 𝑧 ( 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ) )
11 elequ1 ⊢ ( 𝑤 = 𝑧 → ( 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ) )
12 elequ1 ⊢ ( 𝑤 = 𝑧 → ( 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ) )
13 11 12 bibi12d ⊢ ( 𝑤 = 𝑧 → ( ( 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ) ↔ ( 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ) ) )
14 13 a1i ⊢ ( ( ¬ ∀ 𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑥 ∧ ¬ ∀ 𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦 ) → ( 𝑤 = 𝑧 → ( ( 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ) ↔ ( 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ) ) ) )
15 3 10 14 cbvald ⊢ ( ( ¬ ∀ 𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑥 ∧ ¬ ∀ 𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦 ) → ( ∀ 𝑤 ( 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ) ↔ ∀ 𝑧 ( 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ) ) )
16 axextg ⊢ ( ∀ 𝑤 ( 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ) → 𝑥 = 𝑦 )
17 15 16 biimtrrdi ⊢ ( ( ¬ ∀ 𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑥 ∧ ¬ ∀ 𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦 ) → ( ∀ 𝑧 ( 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ) → 𝑥 = 𝑦 ) )