Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem etaslts2

Description: A version of etaslts with fewer hypotheses but a weaker upper bound. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 10-Dec-2021)

Ref Expression
Assertion etaslts2 ( 𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → ∃ 𝑥 ∈ No ( 𝐴 <<s { 𝑥 } ∧ { 𝑥 } <<s 𝐵 ∧ ( bday ‘ 𝑥 ) ⊆ suc ∪ ( bday “ ( 𝐴 ∪ 𝐵 ) ) ) )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 bdayfun ⊢ Fun bday
2 sltsex1 ⊢ ( 𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ V )
3 sltsex2 ⊢ ( 𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → 𝐵 ∈ V )
4 unexg ⊢ ( ( 𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V ) → ( 𝐴 ∪ 𝐵 ) ∈ V )
5 2 3 4 syl2anc ⊢ ( 𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → ( 𝐴 ∪ 𝐵 ) ∈ V )
6 funimaexg ⊢ ( ( Fun bday ∧ ( 𝐴 ∪ 𝐵 ) ∈ V ) → ( bday “ ( 𝐴 ∪ 𝐵 ) ) ∈ V )
7 1 5 6 sylancr ⊢ ( 𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → ( bday “ ( 𝐴 ∪ 𝐵 ) ) ∈ V )
8 7 uniexd ⊢ ( 𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → ∪ ( bday “ ( 𝐴 ∪ 𝐵 ) ) ∈ V )
9 imassrn ⊢ ( bday “ ( 𝐴 ∪ 𝐵 ) ) ⊆ ran bday
10 bdayrn ⊢ ran bday = On
11 9 10 sseqtri ⊢ ( bday “ ( 𝐴 ∪ 𝐵 ) ) ⊆ On
12 ssorduni ⊢ ( ( bday “ ( 𝐴 ∪ 𝐵 ) ) ⊆ On → Ord ∪ ( bday “ ( 𝐴 ∪ 𝐵 ) ) )
13 11 12 ax-mp ⊢ Ord ∪ ( bday “ ( 𝐴 ∪ 𝐵 ) )
14 elon2 ⊢ ( ∪ ( bday “ ( 𝐴 ∪ 𝐵 ) ) ∈ On ↔ ( Ord ∪ ( bday “ ( 𝐴 ∪ 𝐵 ) ) ∧ ∪ ( bday “ ( 𝐴 ∪ 𝐵 ) ) ∈ V ) )
15 13 14 mpbiran ⊢ ( ∪ ( bday “ ( 𝐴 ∪ 𝐵 ) ) ∈ On ↔ ∪ ( bday “ ( 𝐴 ∪ 𝐵 ) ) ∈ V )
16 8 15 sylibr ⊢ ( 𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → ∪ ( bday “ ( 𝐴 ∪ 𝐵 ) ) ∈ On )
17 onsucb ⊢ ( ∪ ( bday “ ( 𝐴 ∪ 𝐵 ) ) ∈ On ↔ suc ∪ ( bday “ ( 𝐴 ∪ 𝐵 ) ) ∈ On )
18 16 17 sylib ⊢ ( 𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → suc ∪ ( bday “ ( 𝐴 ∪ 𝐵 ) ) ∈ On )
19 onsucuni ⊢ ( ( bday “ ( 𝐴 ∪ 𝐵 ) ) ⊆ On → ( bday “ ( 𝐴 ∪ 𝐵 ) ) ⊆ suc ∪ ( bday “ ( 𝐴 ∪ 𝐵 ) ) )
20 11 19 mp1i ⊢ ( 𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → ( bday “ ( 𝐴 ∪ 𝐵 ) ) ⊆ suc ∪ ( bday “ ( 𝐴 ∪ 𝐵 ) ) )
21 etaslts ⊢ ( ( 𝐴 <<s 𝐵 ∧ suc ∪ ( bday “ ( 𝐴 ∪ 𝐵 ) ) ∈ On ∧ ( bday “ ( 𝐴 ∪ 𝐵 ) ) ⊆ suc ∪ ( bday “ ( 𝐴 ∪ 𝐵 ) ) ) → ∃ 𝑥 ∈ No ( 𝐴 <<s { 𝑥 } ∧ { 𝑥 } <<s 𝐵 ∧ ( bday ‘ 𝑥 ) ⊆ suc ∪ ( bday “ ( 𝐴 ∪ 𝐵 ) ) ) )
22 18 20 21 mpd3an23 ⊢ ( 𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → ∃ 𝑥 ∈ No ( 𝐴 <<s { 𝑥 } ∧ { 𝑥 } <<s 𝐵 ∧ ( bday ‘ 𝑥 ) ⊆ suc ∪ ( bday “ ( 𝐴 ∪ 𝐵 ) ) ) )