Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem noinfepregs

Description: There are no infinite descending e. -chains, proven using ax-regs . (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 18-Feb-2026)

Ref Expression
Assertion noinfepregs 𝑥 ∈ ω ( 𝐹 ‘ suc 𝑥 ) ∉ ( 𝐹𝑥 )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 noinfepfnregs ( ( 𝐹 ↾ ω ) Fn ω → ∃ 𝑥 ∈ ω ( ( 𝐹 ↾ ω ) ‘ suc 𝑥 ) ∉ ( ( 𝐹 ↾ ω ) ‘ 𝑥 ) )
2 peano2 ( 𝑥 ∈ ω → suc 𝑥 ∈ ω )
3 2 fvresd ( 𝑥 ∈ ω → ( ( 𝐹 ↾ ω ) ‘ suc 𝑥 ) = ( 𝐹 ‘ suc 𝑥 ) )
4 fvres ( 𝑥 ∈ ω → ( ( 𝐹 ↾ ω ) ‘ 𝑥 ) = ( 𝐹𝑥 ) )
5 3 4 neleq12d ( 𝑥 ∈ ω → ( ( ( 𝐹 ↾ ω ) ‘ suc 𝑥 ) ∉ ( ( 𝐹 ↾ ω ) ‘ 𝑥 ) ↔ ( 𝐹 ‘ suc 𝑥 ) ∉ ( 𝐹𝑥 ) ) )
6 5 rexbiia ( ∃ 𝑥 ∈ ω ( ( 𝐹 ↾ ω ) ‘ suc 𝑥 ) ∉ ( ( 𝐹 ↾ ω ) ‘ 𝑥 ) ↔ ∃ 𝑥 ∈ ω ( 𝐹 ‘ suc 𝑥 ) ∉ ( 𝐹𝑥 ) )
7 1 6 sylib ( ( 𝐹 ↾ ω ) Fn ω → ∃ 𝑥 ∈ ω ( 𝐹 ‘ suc 𝑥 ) ∉ ( 𝐹𝑥 ) )
8 fnres ( ( 𝐹 ↾ ω ) Fn ω ↔ ∀ 𝑥 ∈ ω ∃! 𝑦 𝑥 𝐹 𝑦 )
9 8 notbii ( ¬ ( 𝐹 ↾ ω ) Fn ω ↔ ¬ ∀ 𝑥 ∈ ω ∃! 𝑦 𝑥 𝐹 𝑦 )
10 rexnal ( ∃ 𝑥 ∈ ω ¬ ∃! 𝑦 𝑥 𝐹 𝑦 ↔ ¬ ∀ 𝑥 ∈ ω ∃! 𝑦 𝑥 𝐹 𝑦 )
11 9 10 sylbb2 ( ¬ ( 𝐹 ↾ ω ) Fn ω → ∃ 𝑥 ∈ ω ¬ ∃! 𝑦 𝑥 𝐹 𝑦 )
12 tz6.12-2 ( ¬ ∃! 𝑦 𝑥 𝐹 𝑦 → ( 𝐹𝑥 ) = ∅ )
13 nel02 ( ( 𝐹𝑥 ) = ∅ → ¬ ( 𝐹 ‘ suc 𝑥 ) ∈ ( 𝐹𝑥 ) )
14 df-nel ( ( 𝐹 ‘ suc 𝑥 ) ∉ ( 𝐹𝑥 ) ↔ ¬ ( 𝐹 ‘ suc 𝑥 ) ∈ ( 𝐹𝑥 ) )
15 13 14 sylibr ( ( 𝐹𝑥 ) = ∅ → ( 𝐹 ‘ suc 𝑥 ) ∉ ( 𝐹𝑥 ) )
16 12 15 syl ( ¬ ∃! 𝑦 𝑥 𝐹 𝑦 → ( 𝐹 ‘ suc 𝑥 ) ∉ ( 𝐹𝑥 ) )
17 16 reximi ( ∃ 𝑥 ∈ ω ¬ ∃! 𝑦 𝑥 𝐹 𝑦 → ∃ 𝑥 ∈ ω ( 𝐹 ‘ suc 𝑥 ) ∉ ( 𝐹𝑥 ) )
18 11 17 syl ( ¬ ( 𝐹 ↾ ω ) Fn ω → ∃ 𝑥 ∈ ω ( 𝐹 ‘ suc 𝑥 ) ∉ ( 𝐹𝑥 ) )
19 7 18 pm2.61i 𝑥 ∈ ω ( 𝐹 ‘ suc 𝑥 ) ∉ ( 𝐹𝑥 )