Theorem oprabbidv

Description: Equivalent wff's yield equal operation class abstractions (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 21-Feb-2004)

	Ref	Expression
Hypothesis	oprabbidv.1	⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝜓 ↔ 𝜒 ) )
Assertion	oprabbidv	⊢ ( 𝜑 → { ⟨ ⟨ 𝑥 , 𝑦 ⟩ , 𝑧 ⟩ ∣ 𝜓 } = { ⟨ ⟨ 𝑥 , 𝑦 ⟩ , 𝑧 ⟩ ∣ 𝜒 } )

Proof

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		oprabbidv.1	⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝜓 ↔ 𝜒 ) )
2	1	anbi2d	⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( ( 𝑤 = ⟨ ⟨ 𝑥 , 𝑦 ⟩ , 𝑧 ⟩ ∧ 𝜓 ) ↔ ( 𝑤 = ⟨ ⟨ 𝑥 , 𝑦 ⟩ , 𝑧 ⟩ ∧ 𝜒 ) ) )
3	2	exbidv	⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( ∃ 𝑧 ( 𝑤 = ⟨ ⟨ 𝑥 , 𝑦 ⟩ , 𝑧 ⟩ ∧ 𝜓 ) ↔ ∃ 𝑧 ( 𝑤 = ⟨ ⟨ 𝑥 , 𝑦 ⟩ , 𝑧 ⟩ ∧ 𝜒 ) ) )
4	3	exbidv	⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( ∃ 𝑦 ∃ 𝑧 ( 𝑤 = ⟨ ⟨ 𝑥 , 𝑦 ⟩ , 𝑧 ⟩ ∧ 𝜓 ) ↔ ∃ 𝑦 ∃ 𝑧 ( 𝑤 = ⟨ ⟨ 𝑥 , 𝑦 ⟩ , 𝑧 ⟩ ∧ 𝜒 ) ) )
5	4	exbidv	⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( ∃ 𝑥 ∃ 𝑦 ∃ 𝑧 ( 𝑤 = ⟨ ⟨ 𝑥 , 𝑦 ⟩ , 𝑧 ⟩ ∧ 𝜓 ) ↔ ∃ 𝑥 ∃ 𝑦 ∃ 𝑧 ( 𝑤 = ⟨ ⟨ 𝑥 , 𝑦 ⟩ , 𝑧 ⟩ ∧ 𝜒 ) ) )
6	5	abbidv	⊢ ( 𝜑 → { 𝑤 ∣ ∃ 𝑥 ∃ 𝑦 ∃ 𝑧 ( 𝑤 = ⟨ ⟨ 𝑥 , 𝑦 ⟩ , 𝑧 ⟩ ∧ 𝜓 ) } = { 𝑤 ∣ ∃ 𝑥 ∃ 𝑦 ∃ 𝑧 ( 𝑤 = ⟨ ⟨ 𝑥 , 𝑦 ⟩ , 𝑧 ⟩ ∧ 𝜒 ) } )
7		df-oprab	⊢ { ⟨ ⟨ 𝑥 , 𝑦 ⟩ , 𝑧 ⟩ ∣ 𝜓 } = { 𝑤 ∣ ∃ 𝑥 ∃ 𝑦 ∃ 𝑧 ( 𝑤 = ⟨ ⟨ 𝑥 , 𝑦 ⟩ , 𝑧 ⟩ ∧ 𝜓 ) }
8		df-oprab	⊢ { ⟨ ⟨ 𝑥 , 𝑦 ⟩ , 𝑧 ⟩ ∣ 𝜒 } = { 𝑤 ∣ ∃ 𝑥 ∃ 𝑦 ∃ 𝑧 ( 𝑤 = ⟨ ⟨ 𝑥 , 𝑦 ⟩ , 𝑧 ⟩ ∧ 𝜒 ) }
9	6 7 8	3eqtr4g	⊢ ( 𝜑 → { ⟨ ⟨ 𝑥 , 𝑦 ⟩ , 𝑧 ⟩ ∣ 𝜓 } = { ⟨ ⟨ 𝑥 , 𝑦 ⟩ , 𝑧 ⟩ ∣ 𝜒 } )