Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem sstrALT2

Description: Virtual deduction proof of sstr , transitivity of subclasses, Theorem 6 of Suppes p. 23. This theorem was automatically generated from sstrALT2VD using the command file translate__without__overwriting.cmd . It was not minimized because the automated minimization excluding duplicates generates a minimized proof which, although not directly containing any duplicates, indirectly contains a duplicate. That is, the trace back of the minimized proof contains a duplicate. This is undesirable because some step(s) of the minimized proof use the proven theorem. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 11-Sep-2011) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Ref Expression
Assertion sstrALT2 ( ( 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 ) → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 df-ss ⊢ ( 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ↔ ∀ 𝑥 ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ) )
2 id ⊢ ( ( 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 ) → ( 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 ) )
3 simpr ⊢ ( ( 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 ) → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 )
4 2 3 syl ⊢ ( ( 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 ) → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 )
5 simpl ⊢ ( ( 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 ) → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 )
6 2 5 syl ⊢ ( ( 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 ) → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 )
7 idd ⊢ ( ( 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 ) → ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ) )
8 ssel2 ⊢ ( ( 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 )
9 6 7 8 syl6an ⊢ ( ( 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 ) → ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ) )
10 ssel2 ⊢ ( ( 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 )
11 4 9 10 syl6an ⊢ ( ( 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 ) → ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ) )
12 11 idiALT ⊢ ( ( 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 ) → ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ) )
13 12 alrimiv ⊢ ( ( 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 ) → ∀ 𝑥 ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ) )
14 biimpr ⊢ ( ( 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ↔ ∀ 𝑥 ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ) ) → ( ∀ 𝑥 ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ) → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ) )
15 1 13 14 mpsyl ⊢ ( ( 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 ) → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 )