Description: Virtual deduction proof of sstr , transitivity of subclasses, Theorem 6 of Suppes p. 23. This theorem was automatically generated from sstrALT2VD using the command file translate__without__overwriting.cmd . It was not minimized because the automated minimization excluding duplicates generates a minimized proof which, although not directly containing any duplicates, indirectly contains a duplicate. That is, the trace back of the minimized proof contains a duplicate. This is undesirable because some step(s) of the minimized proof use the proven theorem. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 11-Sep-2011) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
Ref | Expression | ||
---|---|---|---|
Assertion | sstrALT2 | ⊢ ( ( 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 ) → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | dfss2 | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ↔ ∀ 𝑥 ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ) ) | |
2 | id | ⊢ ( ( 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 ) → ( 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 ) ) | |
3 | simpr | ⊢ ( ( 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 ) → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 ) | |
4 | 2 3 | syl | ⊢ ( ( 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 ) → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 ) |
5 | simpl | ⊢ ( ( 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 ) → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ) | |
6 | 2 5 | syl | ⊢ ( ( 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 ) → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ) |
7 | idd | ⊢ ( ( 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 ) → ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ) ) | |
8 | ssel2 | ⊢ ( ( 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ) | |
9 | 6 7 8 | syl6an | ⊢ ( ( 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 ) → ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ) ) |
10 | ssel2 | ⊢ ( ( 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ) | |
11 | 4 9 10 | syl6an | ⊢ ( ( 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 ) → ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ) ) |
12 | 11 | idiALT | ⊢ ( ( 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 ) → ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ) ) |
13 | 12 | alrimiv | ⊢ ( ( 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 ) → ∀ 𝑥 ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ) ) |
14 | biimpr | ⊢ ( ( 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ↔ ∀ 𝑥 ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ) ) → ( ∀ 𝑥 ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ) → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ) ) | |
15 | 1 13 14 | mpsyl | ⊢ ( ( 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 ) → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ) |