Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem uzind4

Description: Induction on the upper set of integers that starts at an integer M . The first four hypotheses give us the substitution instances we need, and the last two are the basis and the induction step. (Contributed by NM, 7-Sep-2005)

Ref Expression
Hypotheses uzind4.1 ⊢ ( 𝑗 = 𝑀 → ( 𝜑 ↔ 𝜓 ) )
uzind4.2 ⊢ ( 𝑗 = 𝑘 → ( 𝜑 ↔ 𝜒 ) )
uzind4.3 ⊢ ( 𝑗 = ( 𝑘 + 1 ) → ( 𝜑 ↔ 𝜃 ) )
uzind4.4 ⊢ ( 𝑗 = 𝑁 → ( 𝜑 ↔ 𝜏 ) )
uzind4.5 ⊢ ( 𝑀 ∈ ℤ → 𝜓 )
uzind4.6 ⊢ ( 𝑘 ∈ ( ℤ≥ ‘ 𝑀 ) → ( 𝜒 → 𝜃 ) )
Assertion uzind4 ( 𝑁 ∈ ( ℤ≥ ‘ 𝑀 ) → 𝜏 )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 uzind4.1 ⊢ ( 𝑗 = 𝑀 → ( 𝜑 ↔ 𝜓 ) )
2 uzind4.2 ⊢ ( 𝑗 = 𝑘 → ( 𝜑 ↔ 𝜒 ) )
3 uzind4.3 ⊢ ( 𝑗 = ( 𝑘 + 1 ) → ( 𝜑 ↔ 𝜃 ) )
4 uzind4.4 ⊢ ( 𝑗 = 𝑁 → ( 𝜑 ↔ 𝜏 ) )
5 uzind4.5 ⊢ ( 𝑀 ∈ ℤ → 𝜓 )
6 uzind4.6 ⊢ ( 𝑘 ∈ ( ℤ≥ ‘ 𝑀 ) → ( 𝜒 → 𝜃 ) )
7 eluzel2 ⊢ ( 𝑁 ∈ ( ℤ≥ ‘ 𝑀 ) → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ )
8 breq2 ⊢ ( 𝑚 = 𝑁 → ( 𝑀 ≤ 𝑚 ↔ 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁 ) )
9 eluzelz ⊢ ( 𝑁 ∈ ( ℤ≥ ‘ 𝑀 ) → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ )
10 eluzle ⊢ ( 𝑁 ∈ ( ℤ≥ ‘ 𝑀 ) → 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁 )
11 8 9 10 elrabd ⊢ ( 𝑁 ∈ ( ℤ≥ ‘ 𝑀 ) → 𝑁 ∈ { 𝑚 ∈ ℤ ∣ 𝑀 ≤ 𝑚 } )
12 breq2 ⊢ ( 𝑚 = 𝑘 → ( 𝑀 ≤ 𝑚 ↔ 𝑀 ≤ 𝑘 ) )
13 12 elrab ⊢ ( 𝑘 ∈ { 𝑚 ∈ ℤ ∣ 𝑀 ≤ 𝑚 } ↔ ( 𝑘 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ≤ 𝑘 ) )
14 eluz2 ⊢ ( 𝑘 ∈ ( ℤ≥ ‘ 𝑀 ) ↔ ( 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ≤ 𝑘 ) )
15 14 biimpri ⊢ ( ( 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ≤ 𝑘 ) → 𝑘 ∈ ( ℤ≥ ‘ 𝑀 ) )
16 15 3expb ⊢ ( ( 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ ( 𝑘 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ≤ 𝑘 ) ) → 𝑘 ∈ ( ℤ≥ ‘ 𝑀 ) )
17 13 16 sylan2b ⊢ ( ( 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑘 ∈ { 𝑚 ∈ ℤ ∣ 𝑀 ≤ 𝑚 } ) → 𝑘 ∈ ( ℤ≥ ‘ 𝑀 ) )
18 17 6 syl ⊢ ( ( 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑘 ∈ { 𝑚 ∈ ℤ ∣ 𝑀 ≤ 𝑚 } ) → ( 𝜒 → 𝜃 ) )
19 1 2 3 4 5 18 uzind3 ⊢ ( ( 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ { 𝑚 ∈ ℤ ∣ 𝑀 ≤ 𝑚 } ) → 𝜏 )
20 7 11 19 syl2anc ⊢ ( 𝑁 ∈ ( ℤ≥ ‘ 𝑀 ) → 𝜏 )