Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem axextnd

Description: A version of the Axiom of Extensionality with no distinct variable conditions. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 . (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-2003) (New usage is discouraged.)

Ref Expression
Assertion axextnd ⊢ ∃ x x ∈ y ↔ x ∈ z → y = z

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 nfnae ⊢ Ⅎ x ¬ ∀ x x = y
2 nfnae ⊢ Ⅎ x ¬ ∀ x x = z
3 1 2 nfan ⊢ Ⅎ x ¬ ∀ x x = y ∧ ¬ ∀ x x = z
4 nfcvf ⊢ ¬ ∀ x x = y → Ⅎ _ x y
5 4 adantr ⊢ ¬ ∀ x x = y ∧ ¬ ∀ x x = z → Ⅎ _ x y
6 5 nfcrd ⊢ ¬ ∀ x x = y ∧ ¬ ∀ x x = z → Ⅎ x w ∈ y
7 nfcvf ⊢ ¬ ∀ x x = z → Ⅎ _ x z
8 7 adantl ⊢ ¬ ∀ x x = y ∧ ¬ ∀ x x = z → Ⅎ _ x z
9 8 nfcrd ⊢ ¬ ∀ x x = y ∧ ¬ ∀ x x = z → Ⅎ x w ∈ z
10 6 9 nfbid ⊢ ¬ ∀ x x = y ∧ ¬ ∀ x x = z → Ⅎ x w ∈ y ↔ w ∈ z
11 elequ1 ⊢ w = x → w ∈ y ↔ x ∈ y
12 elequ1 ⊢ w = x → w ∈ z ↔ x ∈ z
13 11 12 bibi12d ⊢ w = x → w ∈ y ↔ w ∈ z ↔ x ∈ y ↔ x ∈ z
14 13 a1i ⊢ ¬ ∀ x x = y ∧ ¬ ∀ x x = z → w = x → w ∈ y ↔ w ∈ z ↔ x ∈ y ↔ x ∈ z
15 3 10 14 cbvald ⊢ ¬ ∀ x x = y ∧ ¬ ∀ x x = z → ∀ w w ∈ y ↔ w ∈ z ↔ ∀ x x ∈ y ↔ x ∈ z
16 axextg ⊢ ∀ w w ∈ y ↔ w ∈ z → y = z
17 15 16 biimtrrdi ⊢ ¬ ∀ x x = y ∧ ¬ ∀ x x = z → ∀ x x ∈ y ↔ x ∈ z → y = z
18 19.8a ⊢ y = z → ∃ x y = z
19 17 18 syl6 ⊢ ¬ ∀ x x = y ∧ ¬ ∀ x x = z → ∀ x x ∈ y ↔ x ∈ z → ∃ x y = z
20 19 ex ⊢ ¬ ∀ x x = y → ¬ ∀ x x = z → ∀ x x ∈ y ↔ x ∈ z → ∃ x y = z
21 ax6e ⊢ ∃ x x = z
22 ax7 ⊢ x = y → x = z → y = z
23 22 aleximi ⊢ ∀ x x = y → ∃ x x = z → ∃ x y = z
24 21 23 mpi ⊢ ∀ x x = y → ∃ x y = z
25 24 a1d ⊢ ∀ x x = y → ∀ x x ∈ y ↔ x ∈ z → ∃ x y = z
26 ax6e ⊢ ∃ x x = y
27 ax7 ⊢ x = z → x = y → z = y
28 equcomi ⊢ z = y → y = z
29 27 28 syl6 ⊢ x = z → x = y → y = z
30 29 aleximi ⊢ ∀ x x = z → ∃ x x = y → ∃ x y = z
31 26 30 mpi ⊢ ∀ x x = z → ∃ x y = z
32 31 a1d ⊢ ∀ x x = z → ∀ x x ∈ y ↔ x ∈ z → ∃ x y = z
33 20 25 32 pm2.61ii ⊢ ∀ x x ∈ y ↔ x ∈ z → ∃ x y = z
34 33 19.35ri ⊢ ∃ x x ∈ y ↔ x ∈ z → y = z