Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem diag2f1lem

Description: Lemma for diag2f1 . The converse is trivial ( fveq2 ). (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 21-Oct-2025)

Ref Expression
Hypotheses diag2f1.l ⊢ 𝐿 = ( 𝐶 Δfunc 𝐷 )
diag2f1.a ⊢ 𝐴 = ( Base ‘ 𝐶 )
diag2f1.b ⊢ 𝐵 = ( Base ‘ 𝐷 )
diag2f1.h ⊢ 𝐻 = ( Hom ‘ 𝐶 )
diag2f1.c ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat )
diag2f1.d ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Cat )
diag2f1.x ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 )
diag2f1.y ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴 )
diag2f1.0 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ ∅ )
diag2f1lem.f ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ ( 𝑋 𝐻 𝑌 ) )
diag2f1lem.g ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ ( 𝑋 𝐻 𝑌 ) )
Assertion diag2f1lem ( 𝜑 → ( ( ( 𝑋 ( 2nd ‘ 𝐿 ) 𝑌 ) ‘ 𝐹 ) = ( ( 𝑋 ( 2nd ‘ 𝐿 ) 𝑌 ) ‘ 𝐺 ) → 𝐹 = 𝐺 ) )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 diag2f1.l ⊢ 𝐿 = ( 𝐶 Δfunc 𝐷 )
2 diag2f1.a ⊢ 𝐴 = ( Base ‘ 𝐶 )
3 diag2f1.b ⊢ 𝐵 = ( Base ‘ 𝐷 )
4 diag2f1.h ⊢ 𝐻 = ( Hom ‘ 𝐶 )
5 diag2f1.c ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat )
6 diag2f1.d ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Cat )
7 diag2f1.x ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 )
8 diag2f1.y ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴 )
9 diag2f1.0 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ ∅ )
10 diag2f1lem.f ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ ( 𝑋 𝐻 𝑌 ) )
11 diag2f1lem.g ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ ( 𝑋 𝐻 𝑌 ) )
12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 diag2 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( ( 𝑋 ( 2nd ‘ 𝐿 ) 𝑌 ) ‘ 𝐹 ) = ( 𝐵 × { 𝐹 } ) )
13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 11 diag2 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( ( 𝑋 ( 2nd ‘ 𝐿 ) 𝑌 ) ‘ 𝐺 ) = ( 𝐵 × { 𝐺 } ) )
14 12 13 eqeq12d ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( ( ( 𝑋 ( 2nd ‘ 𝐿 ) 𝑌 ) ‘ 𝐹 ) = ( ( 𝑋 ( 2nd ‘ 𝐿 ) 𝑌 ) ‘ 𝐺 ) ↔ ( 𝐵 × { 𝐹 } ) = ( 𝐵 × { 𝐺 } ) ) )
15 xpcan ⊢ ( 𝐵 ≠ ∅ → ( ( 𝐵 × { 𝐹 } ) = ( 𝐵 × { 𝐺 } ) ↔ { 𝐹 } = { 𝐺 } ) )
16 9 15 syl ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( ( 𝐵 × { 𝐹 } ) = ( 𝐵 × { 𝐺 } ) ↔ { 𝐹 } = { 𝐺 } ) )
17 14 16 bitrd ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( ( ( 𝑋 ( 2nd ‘ 𝐿 ) 𝑌 ) ‘ 𝐹 ) = ( ( 𝑋 ( 2nd ‘ 𝐿 ) 𝑌 ) ‘ 𝐺 ) ↔ { 𝐹 } = { 𝐺 } ) )
18 sneqrg ⊢ ( 𝐹 ∈ ( 𝑋 𝐻 𝑌 ) → ( { 𝐹 } = { 𝐺 } → 𝐹 = 𝐺 ) )
19 10 18 syl ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( { 𝐹 } = { 𝐺 } → 𝐹 = 𝐺 ) )
20 17 19 sylbid ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( ( ( 𝑋 ( 2nd ‘ 𝐿 ) 𝑌 ) ‘ 𝐹 ) = ( ( 𝑋 ( 2nd ‘ 𝐿 ) 𝑌 ) ‘ 𝐺 ) → 𝐹 = 𝐺 ) )