Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem idressidex0

Description: The restriction of a structure with an identity element to a subset containing the identity element has an identity element. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 8-Jun-2010) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2013) (Revised by AV, 11-Aug-2026)

Ref Expression
Hypotheses idressidex.b 𝐵 = ( Base ‘ 𝐺 )
idressidex.p + = ( +g𝐺 )
idressidex.o 0 = ( 0g𝐺 )
idressidex.e ( 𝜑 → ∃ 𝑒𝐵𝑥𝐵 ( ( 𝑒 + 𝑥 ) = 𝑥 ∧ ( 𝑥 + 𝑒 ) = 𝑥 ) )
idressidex.s 𝑆 = ( 𝐺s 𝐴 )
idressidex.a ( 𝜑𝐴𝐵 )
idressidex.0 ( 𝜑0𝐴 )
idressidex0.c 𝐶 = ( Base ‘ 𝑆 )
Assertion idressidex0 ( 𝜑 → ∃ 𝑒𝐶𝑥𝐶 ( ( 𝑒 + 𝑥 ) = 𝑥 ∧ ( 𝑥 + 𝑒 ) = 𝑥 ) )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 idressidex.b 𝐵 = ( Base ‘ 𝐺 )
2 idressidex.p + = ( +g𝐺 )
3 idressidex.o 0 = ( 0g𝐺 )
4 idressidex.e ( 𝜑 → ∃ 𝑒𝐵𝑥𝐵 ( ( 𝑒 + 𝑥 ) = 𝑥 ∧ ( 𝑥 + 𝑒 ) = 𝑥 ) )
5 idressidex.s 𝑆 = ( 𝐺s 𝐴 )
6 idressidex.a ( 𝜑𝐴𝐵 )
7 idressidex.0 ( 𝜑0𝐴 )
8 idressidex0.c 𝐶 = ( Base ‘ 𝑆 )
9 1 3 2 4 0gisid ( 𝜑 → ( 0𝐵 ∧ ∀ 𝑥𝐵 ( ( 0 + 𝑥 ) = 𝑥 ∧ ( 𝑥 + 0 ) = 𝑥 ) ) )
10 5 1 ressbas2 ( 𝐴𝐵𝐴 = ( Base ‘ 𝑆 ) )
11 6 10 syl ( 𝜑𝐴 = ( Base ‘ 𝑆 ) )
12 8 11 eqtr4id ( 𝜑𝐶 = 𝐴 )
13 7 12 eleqtrrd ( 𝜑0𝐶 )
14 5 1 ressbasss ( Base ‘ 𝑆 ) ⊆ 𝐵
15 8 14 eqsstri 𝐶𝐵
16 ssralv ( 𝐶𝐵 → ( ∀ 𝑥𝐵 ( ( 0 + 𝑥 ) = 𝑥 ∧ ( 𝑥 + 0 ) = 𝑥 ) → ∀ 𝑥𝐶 ( ( 0 + 𝑥 ) = 𝑥 ∧ ( 𝑥 + 0 ) = 𝑥 ) ) )
17 15 16 mp1i ( 𝜑 → ( ∀ 𝑥𝐵 ( ( 0 + 𝑥 ) = 𝑥 ∧ ( 𝑥 + 0 ) = 𝑥 ) → ∀ 𝑥𝐶 ( ( 0 + 𝑥 ) = 𝑥 ∧ ( 𝑥 + 0 ) = 𝑥 ) ) )
18 17 adantld ( 𝜑 → ( ( 0𝐵 ∧ ∀ 𝑥𝐵 ( ( 0 + 𝑥 ) = 𝑥 ∧ ( 𝑥 + 0 ) = 𝑥 ) ) → ∀ 𝑥𝐶 ( ( 0 + 𝑥 ) = 𝑥 ∧ ( 𝑥 + 0 ) = 𝑥 ) ) )
19 18 adantr ( ( 𝜑𝑒 = 0 ) → ( ( 0𝐵 ∧ ∀ 𝑥𝐵 ( ( 0 + 𝑥 ) = 𝑥 ∧ ( 𝑥 + 0 ) = 𝑥 ) ) → ∀ 𝑥𝐶 ( ( 0 + 𝑥 ) = 𝑥 ∧ ( 𝑥 + 0 ) = 𝑥 ) ) )
20 oveq1 ( 𝑒 = 0 → ( 𝑒 + 𝑥 ) = ( 0 + 𝑥 ) )
21 20 eqeq1d ( 𝑒 = 0 → ( ( 𝑒 + 𝑥 ) = 𝑥 ↔ ( 0 + 𝑥 ) = 𝑥 ) )
22 21 ovanraleqv ( 𝑒 = 0 → ( ∀ 𝑥𝐶 ( ( 𝑒 + 𝑥 ) = 𝑥 ∧ ( 𝑥 + 𝑒 ) = 𝑥 ) ↔ ∀ 𝑥𝐶 ( ( 0 + 𝑥 ) = 𝑥 ∧ ( 𝑥 + 0 ) = 𝑥 ) ) )
23 22 adantl ( ( 𝜑𝑒 = 0 ) → ( ∀ 𝑥𝐶 ( ( 𝑒 + 𝑥 ) = 𝑥 ∧ ( 𝑥 + 𝑒 ) = 𝑥 ) ↔ ∀ 𝑥𝐶 ( ( 0 + 𝑥 ) = 𝑥 ∧ ( 𝑥 + 0 ) = 𝑥 ) ) )
24 19 23 sylibrd ( ( 𝜑𝑒 = 0 ) → ( ( 0𝐵 ∧ ∀ 𝑥𝐵 ( ( 0 + 𝑥 ) = 𝑥 ∧ ( 𝑥 + 0 ) = 𝑥 ) ) → ∀ 𝑥𝐶 ( ( 𝑒 + 𝑥 ) = 𝑥 ∧ ( 𝑥 + 𝑒 ) = 𝑥 ) ) )
25 13 24 rspcimedv ( 𝜑 → ( ( 0𝐵 ∧ ∀ 𝑥𝐵 ( ( 0 + 𝑥 ) = 𝑥 ∧ ( 𝑥 + 0 ) = 𝑥 ) ) → ∃ 𝑒𝐶𝑥𝐶 ( ( 𝑒 + 𝑥 ) = 𝑥 ∧ ( 𝑥 + 𝑒 ) = 𝑥 ) ) )
26 9 25 mpd ( 𝜑 → ∃ 𝑒𝐶𝑥𝐶 ( ( 𝑒 + 𝑥 ) = 𝑥 ∧ ( 𝑥 + 𝑒 ) = 𝑥 ) )