Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem ifpim1g

Description: Implication of conditional logical operators. (Contributed by RP, 18-Apr-2020)

Ref Expression
Assertion ifpim1g ( ( if- ( 𝜑 , 𝜒 , 𝜃 ) → if- ( 𝜓 , 𝜒 , 𝜃 ) ) ↔ ( ( ( 𝜓 → 𝜑 ) ∨ ( 𝜃 → 𝜒 ) ) ∧ ( ( 𝜑 → 𝜓 ) ∨ ( 𝜒 → 𝜃 ) ) ) )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 ifpim123g ⊢ ( ( if- ( 𝜑 , 𝜒 , 𝜃 ) → if- ( 𝜓 , 𝜒 , 𝜃 ) ) ↔ ( ( ( ( 𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓 ) ∨ ( 𝜒 → 𝜒 ) ) ∧ ( ( 𝜓 → 𝜑 ) ∨ ( 𝜃 → 𝜒 ) ) ) ∧ ( ( ( 𝜑 → 𝜓 ) ∨ ( 𝜒 → 𝜃 ) ) ∧ ( ( ¬ 𝜓 → 𝜑 ) ∨ ( 𝜃 → 𝜃 ) ) ) ) )
2 id ⊢ ( 𝜒 → 𝜒 )
3 2 olci ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓 ) ∨ ( 𝜒 → 𝜒 ) )
4 3 biantrur ⊢ ( ( ( 𝜓 → 𝜑 ) ∨ ( 𝜃 → 𝜒 ) ) ↔ ( ( ( 𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓 ) ∨ ( 𝜒 → 𝜒 ) ) ∧ ( ( 𝜓 → 𝜑 ) ∨ ( 𝜃 → 𝜒 ) ) ) )
5 4 bicomi ⊢ ( ( ( ( 𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓 ) ∨ ( 𝜒 → 𝜒 ) ) ∧ ( ( 𝜓 → 𝜑 ) ∨ ( 𝜃 → 𝜒 ) ) ) ↔ ( ( 𝜓 → 𝜑 ) ∨ ( 𝜃 → 𝜒 ) ) )
6 id ⊢ ( 𝜃 → 𝜃 )
7 6 olci ⊢ ( ( ¬ 𝜓 → 𝜑 ) ∨ ( 𝜃 → 𝜃 ) )
8 7 biantru ⊢ ( ( ( 𝜑 → 𝜓 ) ∨ ( 𝜒 → 𝜃 ) ) ↔ ( ( ( 𝜑 → 𝜓 ) ∨ ( 𝜒 → 𝜃 ) ) ∧ ( ( ¬ 𝜓 → 𝜑 ) ∨ ( 𝜃 → 𝜃 ) ) ) )
9 8 bicomi ⊢ ( ( ( ( 𝜑 → 𝜓 ) ∨ ( 𝜒 → 𝜃 ) ) ∧ ( ( ¬ 𝜓 → 𝜑 ) ∨ ( 𝜃 → 𝜃 ) ) ) ↔ ( ( 𝜑 → 𝜓 ) ∨ ( 𝜒 → 𝜃 ) ) )
10 5 9 anbi12i ⊢ ( ( ( ( ( 𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓 ) ∨ ( 𝜒 → 𝜒 ) ) ∧ ( ( 𝜓 → 𝜑 ) ∨ ( 𝜃 → 𝜒 ) ) ) ∧ ( ( ( 𝜑 → 𝜓 ) ∨ ( 𝜒 → 𝜃 ) ) ∧ ( ( ¬ 𝜓 → 𝜑 ) ∨ ( 𝜃 → 𝜃 ) ) ) ) ↔ ( ( ( 𝜓 → 𝜑 ) ∨ ( 𝜃 → 𝜒 ) ) ∧ ( ( 𝜑 → 𝜓 ) ∨ ( 𝜒 → 𝜃 ) ) ) )
11 1 10 bitri ⊢ ( ( if- ( 𝜑 , 𝜒 , 𝜃 ) → if- ( 𝜓 , 𝜒 , 𝜃 ) ) ↔ ( ( ( 𝜓 → 𝜑 ) ∨ ( 𝜃 → 𝜒 ) ) ∧ ( ( 𝜑 → 𝜓 ) ∨ ( 𝜒 → 𝜃 ) ) ) )