Metamath Proof Explorer
Description: A counterexample for liminflelimsup , showing that the second hypothesis
is needed. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022)
Proof
Step |
Hyp |
Ref |
Expression |
1 |
|
mnfltpnf |
⊢ -∞ < +∞ |
2 |
|
limsup0 |
⊢ ( lim sup ‘ ∅ ) = -∞ |
3 |
|
liminf0 |
⊢ ( lim inf ‘ ∅ ) = +∞ |
4 |
2 3
|
breq12i |
⊢ ( ( lim sup ‘ ∅ ) < ( lim inf ‘ ∅ ) ↔ -∞ < +∞ ) |
5 |
1 4
|
mpbir |
⊢ ( lim sup ‘ ∅ ) < ( lim inf ‘ ∅ ) |