Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem lindslinindimp2lem1

Description: Lemma 1 for lindslinindsimp2 . (Contributed by AV, 25-Apr-2019)

Ref Expression
Hypotheses lindslinind.r ⊢ 𝑅 = ( Scalar ‘ 𝑀 )
lindslinind.b ⊢ 𝐵 = ( Base ‘ 𝑅 )
lindslinind.0 ⊢ 0 = ( 0g ‘ 𝑅 )
lindslinind.z ⊢ 𝑍 = ( 0g ‘ 𝑀 )
lindslinind.y ⊢ 𝑌 = ( ( invg ‘ 𝑅 ) ‘ ( 𝑓 ‘ 𝑥 ) )
lindslinind.g ⊢ 𝐺 = ( 𝑓 ↾ ( 𝑆 ∖ { 𝑥 } ) )
Assertion lindslinindimp2lem1 ( ( ( 𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ LMod ) ∧ ( 𝑆 ⊆ ( Base ‘ 𝑀 ) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ ( 𝐵 ↑m 𝑆 ) ) ) → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 lindslinind.r ⊢ 𝑅 = ( Scalar ‘ 𝑀 )
2 lindslinind.b ⊢ 𝐵 = ( Base ‘ 𝑅 )
3 lindslinind.0 ⊢ 0 = ( 0g ‘ 𝑅 )
4 lindslinind.z ⊢ 𝑍 = ( 0g ‘ 𝑀 )
5 lindslinind.y ⊢ 𝑌 = ( ( invg ‘ 𝑅 ) ‘ ( 𝑓 ‘ 𝑥 ) )
6 lindslinind.g ⊢ 𝐺 = ( 𝑓 ↾ ( 𝑆 ∖ { 𝑥 } ) )
7 1 lmodfgrp ⊢ ( 𝑀 ∈ LMod → 𝑅 ∈ Grp )
8 7 adantl ⊢ ( ( 𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ LMod ) → 𝑅 ∈ Grp )
9 elmapi ⊢ ( 𝑓 ∈ ( 𝐵 ↑m 𝑆 ) → 𝑓 : 𝑆 ⟶ 𝐵 )
10 ffvelcdm ⊢ ( ( 𝑓 : 𝑆 ⟶ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ) → ( 𝑓 ‘ 𝑥 ) ∈ 𝐵 )
11 10 a1d ⊢ ( ( 𝑓 : 𝑆 ⟶ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ) → ( 𝑆 ⊆ ( Base ‘ 𝑀 ) → ( 𝑓 ‘ 𝑥 ) ∈ 𝐵 ) )
12 11 ex ⊢ ( 𝑓 : 𝑆 ⟶ 𝐵 → ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 → ( 𝑆 ⊆ ( Base ‘ 𝑀 ) → ( 𝑓 ‘ 𝑥 ) ∈ 𝐵 ) ) )
13 9 12 syl ⊢ ( 𝑓 ∈ ( 𝐵 ↑m 𝑆 ) → ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 → ( 𝑆 ⊆ ( Base ‘ 𝑀 ) → ( 𝑓 ‘ 𝑥 ) ∈ 𝐵 ) ) )
14 13 com13 ⊢ ( 𝑆 ⊆ ( Base ‘ 𝑀 ) → ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 → ( 𝑓 ∈ ( 𝐵 ↑m 𝑆 ) → ( 𝑓 ‘ 𝑥 ) ∈ 𝐵 ) ) )
15 14 3imp ⊢ ( ( 𝑆 ⊆ ( Base ‘ 𝑀 ) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ ( 𝐵 ↑m 𝑆 ) ) → ( 𝑓 ‘ 𝑥 ) ∈ 𝐵 )
16 eqid ⊢ ( invg ‘ 𝑅 ) = ( invg ‘ 𝑅 )
17 2 16 grpinvcl ⊢ ( ( 𝑅 ∈ Grp ∧ ( 𝑓 ‘ 𝑥 ) ∈ 𝐵 ) → ( ( invg ‘ 𝑅 ) ‘ ( 𝑓 ‘ 𝑥 ) ) ∈ 𝐵 )
18 8 15 17 syl2an ⊢ ( ( ( 𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ LMod ) ∧ ( 𝑆 ⊆ ( Base ‘ 𝑀 ) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ ( 𝐵 ↑m 𝑆 ) ) ) → ( ( invg ‘ 𝑅 ) ‘ ( 𝑓 ‘ 𝑥 ) ) ∈ 𝐵 )
19 5 18 eqeltrid ⊢ ( ( ( 𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ LMod ) ∧ ( 𝑆 ⊆ ( Base ‘ 𝑀 ) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ ( 𝐵 ↑m 𝑆 ) ) ) → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 )