Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem pjclem4a

Description: Lemma for projection commutation theorem. (Contributed by NM, 2-Dec-2000) (New usage is discouraged.)

Ref Expression
Hypotheses pjclem1.1 ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Cℋ
pjclem1.2 ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ
Assertion pjclem4a ( 𝐴 ∈ ( 𝐺 ∩ 𝐻 ) → ( ( ( projℎ ‘ 𝐺 ) ∘ ( projℎ ‘ 𝐻 ) ) ‘ 𝐴 ) = 𝐴 )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 pjclem1.1 ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Cℋ
2 pjclem1.2 ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ
3 elin ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ ( 𝐺 ∩ 𝐻 ) ↔ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐺 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐻 ) )
4 2 cheli ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐻 → 𝐴 ∈ ℋ )
5 4 adantl ⊢ ( ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐺 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐻 ) → 𝐴 ∈ ℋ )
6 1 2 pjcoi ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ ℋ → ( ( ( projℎ ‘ 𝐺 ) ∘ ( projℎ ‘ 𝐻 ) ) ‘ 𝐴 ) = ( ( projℎ ‘ 𝐺 ) ‘ ( ( projℎ ‘ 𝐻 ) ‘ 𝐴 ) ) )
7 5 6 syl ⊢ ( ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐺 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐻 ) → ( ( ( projℎ ‘ 𝐺 ) ∘ ( projℎ ‘ 𝐻 ) ) ‘ 𝐴 ) = ( ( projℎ ‘ 𝐺 ) ‘ ( ( projℎ ‘ 𝐻 ) ‘ 𝐴 ) ) )
8 pjid ⊢ ( ( 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐻 ) → ( ( projℎ ‘ 𝐻 ) ‘ 𝐴 ) = 𝐴 )
9 2 8 mpan ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐻 → ( ( projℎ ‘ 𝐻 ) ‘ 𝐴 ) = 𝐴 )
10 eleq1 ⊢ ( ( ( projℎ ‘ 𝐻 ) ‘ 𝐴 ) = 𝐴 → ( ( ( projℎ ‘ 𝐻 ) ‘ 𝐴 ) ∈ 𝐺 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐺 ) )
11 pjid ⊢ ( ( 𝐺 ∈ Cℋ ∧ ( ( projℎ ‘ 𝐻 ) ‘ 𝐴 ) ∈ 𝐺 ) → ( ( projℎ ‘ 𝐺 ) ‘ ( ( projℎ ‘ 𝐻 ) ‘ 𝐴 ) ) = ( ( projℎ ‘ 𝐻 ) ‘ 𝐴 ) )
12 1 11 mpan ⊢ ( ( ( projℎ ‘ 𝐻 ) ‘ 𝐴 ) ∈ 𝐺 → ( ( projℎ ‘ 𝐺 ) ‘ ( ( projℎ ‘ 𝐻 ) ‘ 𝐴 ) ) = ( ( projℎ ‘ 𝐻 ) ‘ 𝐴 ) )
13 10 12 biimtrrdi ⊢ ( ( ( projℎ ‘ 𝐻 ) ‘ 𝐴 ) = 𝐴 → ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐺 → ( ( projℎ ‘ 𝐺 ) ‘ ( ( projℎ ‘ 𝐻 ) ‘ 𝐴 ) ) = ( ( projℎ ‘ 𝐻 ) ‘ 𝐴 ) ) )
14 eqeq2 ⊢ ( ( ( projℎ ‘ 𝐻 ) ‘ 𝐴 ) = 𝐴 → ( ( ( projℎ ‘ 𝐺 ) ‘ ( ( projℎ ‘ 𝐻 ) ‘ 𝐴 ) ) = ( ( projℎ ‘ 𝐻 ) ‘ 𝐴 ) ↔ ( ( projℎ ‘ 𝐺 ) ‘ ( ( projℎ ‘ 𝐻 ) ‘ 𝐴 ) ) = 𝐴 ) )
15 13 14 sylibd ⊢ ( ( ( projℎ ‘ 𝐻 ) ‘ 𝐴 ) = 𝐴 → ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐺 → ( ( projℎ ‘ 𝐺 ) ‘ ( ( projℎ ‘ 𝐻 ) ‘ 𝐴 ) ) = 𝐴 ) )
16 9 15 syl ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐻 → ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐺 → ( ( projℎ ‘ 𝐺 ) ‘ ( ( projℎ ‘ 𝐻 ) ‘ 𝐴 ) ) = 𝐴 ) )
17 16 impcom ⊢ ( ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐺 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐻 ) → ( ( projℎ ‘ 𝐺 ) ‘ ( ( projℎ ‘ 𝐻 ) ‘ 𝐴 ) ) = 𝐴 )
18 7 17 eqtrd ⊢ ( ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐺 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐻 ) → ( ( ( projℎ ‘ 𝐺 ) ∘ ( projℎ ‘ 𝐻 ) ) ‘ 𝐴 ) = 𝐴 )
19 3 18 sylbi ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ ( 𝐺 ∩ 𝐻 ) → ( ( ( projℎ ‘ 𝐺 ) ∘ ( projℎ ‘ 𝐻 ) ) ‘ 𝐴 ) = 𝐴 )