Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem rencldnfi

Description: A set of real numbers which comes arbitrarily close to some target yet excludes it is infinite. The work is done in rencldnfilem using infima; this theorem removes the requirement that A be nonempty. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Oct-2014)

Ref Expression
Assertion rencldnfi ( ( ( 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ) ∧ ∀ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ( abs ‘ ( 𝑦 − 𝐵 ) ) < 𝑥 ) → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ Fin )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 simpl1 ⊢ ( ( ( 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ) ∧ ∀ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ( abs ‘ ( 𝑦 − 𝐵 ) ) < 𝑥 ) → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ )
2 simpl2 ⊢ ( ( ( 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ) ∧ ∀ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ( abs ‘ ( 𝑦 − 𝐵 ) ) < 𝑥 ) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ )
3 rexn0 ⊢ ( ∃ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ( abs ‘ ( 𝑦 − 𝐵 ) ) < 𝑥 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅ )
4 3 ralimi ⊢ ( ∀ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ( abs ‘ ( 𝑦 − 𝐵 ) ) < 𝑥 → ∀ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ )
5 1rp ⊢ 1 ∈ ℝ+
6 ne0i ⊢ ( 1 ∈ ℝ+ → ℝ+ ≠ ∅ )
7 r19.3rzv ⊢ ( ℝ+ ≠ ∅ → ( 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ↔ ∀ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ) )
8 5 6 7 mp2b ⊢ ( 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ↔ ∀ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ )
9 4 8 sylibr ⊢ ( ∀ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ( abs ‘ ( 𝑦 − 𝐵 ) ) < 𝑥 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅ )
10 9 adantl ⊢ ( ( ( 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ) ∧ ∀ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ( abs ‘ ( 𝑦 − 𝐵 ) ) < 𝑥 ) → 𝐴 ≠ ∅ )
11 simpl3 ⊢ ( ( ( 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ) ∧ ∀ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ( abs ‘ ( 𝑦 − 𝐵 ) ) < 𝑥 ) → ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 )
12 10 11 jca ⊢ ( ( ( 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ) ∧ ∀ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ( abs ‘ ( 𝑦 − 𝐵 ) ) < 𝑥 ) → ( 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ) )
13 simpr ⊢ ( ( ( 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ) ∧ ∀ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ( abs ‘ ( 𝑦 − 𝐵 ) ) < 𝑥 ) → ∀ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ( abs ‘ ( 𝑦 − 𝐵 ) ) < 𝑥 )
14 rencldnfilem ⊢ ( ( ( 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ ( 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ) ) ∧ ∀ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ( abs ‘ ( 𝑦 − 𝐵 ) ) < 𝑥 ) → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ Fin )
15 1 2 12 13 14 syl31anc ⊢ ( ( ( 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ) ∧ ∀ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ( abs ‘ ( 𝑦 − 𝐵 ) ) < 𝑥 ) → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ Fin )