Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem ssltbday

Description: Birthday comparison rule for surreals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 23-Feb-2026)

Ref Expression
Hypotheses ssltbday.1 ( 𝜑𝐴 = ( 𝐿 |s 𝑅 ) )
ssltbday.2 ( 𝜑𝐵 No )
ssltbday.3 ( 𝜑𝐿 <<s { 𝐵 } )
ssltbday.4 ( 𝜑 → { 𝐵 } <<s 𝑅 )
Assertion ssltbday ( 𝜑 → ( bday 𝐴 ) ⊆ ( bday 𝐵 ) )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 ssltbday.1 ( 𝜑𝐴 = ( 𝐿 |s 𝑅 ) )
2 ssltbday.2 ( 𝜑𝐵 No )
3 ssltbday.3 ( 𝜑𝐿 <<s { 𝐵 } )
4 ssltbday.4 ( 𝜑 → { 𝐵 } <<s 𝑅 )
5 1 fveq2d ( 𝜑 → ( bday 𝐴 ) = ( bday ‘ ( 𝐿 |s 𝑅 ) ) )
6 2 snn0d ( 𝜑 → { 𝐵 } ≠ ∅ )
7 sslttr ( ( 𝐿 <<s { 𝐵 } ∧ { 𝐵 } <<s 𝑅 ∧ { 𝐵 } ≠ ∅ ) → 𝐿 <<s 𝑅 )
8 3 4 6 7 syl3anc ( 𝜑𝐿 <<s 𝑅 )
9 scutbday ( 𝐿 <<s 𝑅 → ( bday ‘ ( 𝐿 |s 𝑅 ) ) = ( bday “ { 𝑥 No ∣ ( 𝐿 <<s { 𝑥 } ∧ { 𝑥 } <<s 𝑅 ) } ) )
10 8 9 syl ( 𝜑 → ( bday ‘ ( 𝐿 |s 𝑅 ) ) = ( bday “ { 𝑥 No ∣ ( 𝐿 <<s { 𝑥 } ∧ { 𝑥 } <<s 𝑅 ) } ) )
11 bdayfn bday Fn No
12 ssrab2 { 𝑥 No ∣ ( 𝐿 <<s { 𝑥 } ∧ { 𝑥 } <<s 𝑅 ) } ⊆ No
13 sneq ( 𝑥 = 𝐵 → { 𝑥 } = { 𝐵 } )
14 13 breq2d ( 𝑥 = 𝐵 → ( 𝐿 <<s { 𝑥 } ↔ 𝐿 <<s { 𝐵 } ) )
15 13 breq1d ( 𝑥 = 𝐵 → ( { 𝑥 } <<s 𝑅 ↔ { 𝐵 } <<s 𝑅 ) )
16 14 15 anbi12d ( 𝑥 = 𝐵 → ( ( 𝐿 <<s { 𝑥 } ∧ { 𝑥 } <<s 𝑅 ) ↔ ( 𝐿 <<s { 𝐵 } ∧ { 𝐵 } <<s 𝑅 ) ) )
17 3 4 jca ( 𝜑 → ( 𝐿 <<s { 𝐵 } ∧ { 𝐵 } <<s 𝑅 ) )
18 16 2 17 elrabd ( 𝜑𝐵 ∈ { 𝑥 No ∣ ( 𝐿 <<s { 𝑥 } ∧ { 𝑥 } <<s 𝑅 ) } )
19 fnfvima ( ( bday Fn No ∧ { 𝑥 No ∣ ( 𝐿 <<s { 𝑥 } ∧ { 𝑥 } <<s 𝑅 ) } ⊆ No 𝐵 ∈ { 𝑥 No ∣ ( 𝐿 <<s { 𝑥 } ∧ { 𝑥 } <<s 𝑅 ) } ) → ( bday 𝐵 ) ∈ ( bday “ { 𝑥 No ∣ ( 𝐿 <<s { 𝑥 } ∧ { 𝑥 } <<s 𝑅 ) } ) )
20 11 12 18 19 mp3an12i ( 𝜑 → ( bday 𝐵 ) ∈ ( bday “ { 𝑥 No ∣ ( 𝐿 <<s { 𝑥 } ∧ { 𝑥 } <<s 𝑅 ) } ) )
21 intss1 ( ( bday 𝐵 ) ∈ ( bday “ { 𝑥 No ∣ ( 𝐿 <<s { 𝑥 } ∧ { 𝑥 } <<s 𝑅 ) } ) → ( bday “ { 𝑥 No ∣ ( 𝐿 <<s { 𝑥 } ∧ { 𝑥 } <<s 𝑅 ) } ) ⊆ ( bday 𝐵 ) )
22 20 21 syl ( 𝜑 ( bday “ { 𝑥 No ∣ ( 𝐿 <<s { 𝑥 } ∧ { 𝑥 } <<s 𝑅 ) } ) ⊆ ( bday 𝐵 ) )
23 10 22 eqsstrd ( 𝜑 → ( bday ‘ ( 𝐿 |s 𝑅 ) ) ⊆ ( bday 𝐵 ) )
24 5 23 eqsstrd ( 𝜑 → ( bday 𝐴 ) ⊆ ( bday 𝐵 ) )