Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem subtr

Description: Transitivity of implicit substitution. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 13-Sep-2009) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016)

Ref Expression
Hypotheses subtr.1 ⊢ Ⅎ 𝑥 𝐴
subtr.2 ⊢ Ⅎ 𝑥 𝐵
subtr.3 ⊢ Ⅎ 𝑥 𝑌
subtr.4 ⊢ Ⅎ 𝑥 𝑍
subtr.5 ⊢ ( 𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝑋 = 𝑌 )
subtr.6 ⊢ ( 𝑥 = 𝐵 → 𝑋 = 𝑍 )
Assertion subtr ( ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ) → ( 𝐴 = 𝐵 → 𝑌 = 𝑍 ) )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 subtr.1 ⊢ Ⅎ 𝑥 𝐴
2 subtr.2 ⊢ Ⅎ 𝑥 𝐵
3 subtr.3 ⊢ Ⅎ 𝑥 𝑌
4 subtr.4 ⊢ Ⅎ 𝑥 𝑍
5 subtr.5 ⊢ ( 𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝑋 = 𝑌 )
6 subtr.6 ⊢ ( 𝑥 = 𝐵 → 𝑋 = 𝑍 )
7 1 2 nfeq ⊢ Ⅎ 𝑥 𝐴 = 𝐵
8 3 4 nfeq ⊢ Ⅎ 𝑥 𝑌 = 𝑍
9 7 8 nfim ⊢ Ⅎ 𝑥 ( 𝐴 = 𝐵 → 𝑌 = 𝑍 )
10 eqeq1 ⊢ ( 𝑥 = 𝐴 → ( 𝑥 = 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ) )
11 5 eqeq1d ⊢ ( 𝑥 = 𝐴 → ( 𝑋 = 𝑍 ↔ 𝑌 = 𝑍 ) )
12 10 11 imbi12d ⊢ ( 𝑥 = 𝐴 → ( ( 𝑥 = 𝐵 → 𝑋 = 𝑍 ) ↔ ( 𝐴 = 𝐵 → 𝑌 = 𝑍 ) ) )
13 1 9 12 6 vtoclgf ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 → ( 𝐴 = 𝐵 → 𝑌 = 𝑍 ) )
14 13 adantr ⊢ ( ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ) → ( 𝐴 = 𝐵 → 𝑌 = 𝑍 ) )