Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem oprabex3

Description: Existence of an operation class abstraction (special case). (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2004)

Ref Expression
Hypotheses oprabex3.1 ⊢ H ∈ V
oprabex3.2 ⊢ F = x y z | x ∈ H × H ∧ y ∈ H × H ∧ ∃ w ∃ v ∃ u ∃ f x = w v ∧ y = u f ∧ z = R
Assertion oprabex3 ⊢ F ∈ V

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 oprabex3.1 ⊢ H ∈ V
2 oprabex3.2 ⊢ F = x y z | x ∈ H × H ∧ y ∈ H × H ∧ ∃ w ∃ v ∃ u ∃ f x = w v ∧ y = u f ∧ z = R
3 1 1 xpex ⊢ H × H ∈ V
4 moeq ⊢ ∃* z z = R
5 4 mosubop ⊢ ∃* z ∃ u ∃ f y = u f ∧ z = R
6 5 mosubop ⊢ ∃* z ∃ w ∃ v x = w v ∧ ∃ u ∃ f y = u f ∧ z = R
7 anass ⊢ x = w v ∧ y = u f ∧ z = R ↔ x = w v ∧ y = u f ∧ z = R
8 7 2exbii ⊢ ∃ u ∃ f x = w v ∧ y = u f ∧ z = R ↔ ∃ u ∃ f x = w v ∧ y = u f ∧ z = R
9 19.42vv ⊢ ∃ u ∃ f x = w v ∧ y = u f ∧ z = R ↔ x = w v ∧ ∃ u ∃ f y = u f ∧ z = R
10 8 9 bitri ⊢ ∃ u ∃ f x = w v ∧ y = u f ∧ z = R ↔ x = w v ∧ ∃ u ∃ f y = u f ∧ z = R
11 10 2exbii ⊢ ∃ w ∃ v ∃ u ∃ f x = w v ∧ y = u f ∧ z = R ↔ ∃ w ∃ v x = w v ∧ ∃ u ∃ f y = u f ∧ z = R
12 11 mobii ⊢ ∃* z ∃ w ∃ v ∃ u ∃ f x = w v ∧ y = u f ∧ z = R ↔ ∃* z ∃ w ∃ v x = w v ∧ ∃ u ∃ f y = u f ∧ z = R
13 6 12 mpbir ⊢ ∃* z ∃ w ∃ v ∃ u ∃ f x = w v ∧ y = u f ∧ z = R
14 13 a1i ⊢ x ∈ H × H ∧ y ∈ H × H → ∃* z ∃ w ∃ v ∃ u ∃ f x = w v ∧ y = u f ∧ z = R
15 3 3 14 2 oprabex ⊢ F ∈ V