Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem chnrin

Description: Satisfying two chain relations makes a chain under their intersection. (Contributed by Ender Ting, 24-Jul-2026)

Ref Expression
Assertion chnrin ( ( 𝐴 ∈ ( 𝑅 Chain 𝐵 ) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ( < Chain 𝐵 ) ) → 𝐴 ∈ ( ( 𝑅 ∩ < ) Chain 𝐵 ) )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 ischn ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ ( 𝑅 Chain 𝐵 ) ↔ ( 𝐴 ∈ Word 𝐵 ∧ ∀ 𝑛 ∈ ( dom 𝐴 ∖ { 0 } ) ( 𝐴 ‘ ( 𝑛 − 1 ) ) 𝑅 ( 𝐴 ‘ 𝑛 ) ) )
2 1 simplbi ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ ( 𝑅 Chain 𝐵 ) → 𝐴 ∈ Word 𝐵 )
3 2 adantr ⊢ ( ( 𝐴 ∈ ( 𝑅 Chain 𝐵 ) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ( < Chain 𝐵 ) ) → 𝐴 ∈ Word 𝐵 )
4 1 simprbi ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ ( 𝑅 Chain 𝐵 ) → ∀ 𝑛 ∈ ( dom 𝐴 ∖ { 0 } ) ( 𝐴 ‘ ( 𝑛 − 1 ) ) 𝑅 ( 𝐴 ‘ 𝑛 ) )
5 4 adantr ⊢ ( ( 𝐴 ∈ ( 𝑅 Chain 𝐵 ) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ( < Chain 𝐵 ) ) → ∀ 𝑛 ∈ ( dom 𝐴 ∖ { 0 } ) ( 𝐴 ‘ ( 𝑛 − 1 ) ) 𝑅 ( 𝐴 ‘ 𝑛 ) )
6 5 r19.21bi ⊢ ( ( ( 𝐴 ∈ ( 𝑅 Chain 𝐵 ) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ( < Chain 𝐵 ) ) ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ( dom 𝐴 ∖ { 0 } ) ) → ( 𝐴 ‘ ( 𝑛 − 1 ) ) 𝑅 ( 𝐴 ‘ 𝑛 ) )
7 ischn ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ ( < Chain 𝐵 ) ↔ ( 𝐴 ∈ Word 𝐵 ∧ ∀ 𝑛 ∈ ( dom 𝐴 ∖ { 0 } ) ( 𝐴 ‘ ( 𝑛 − 1 ) ) < ( 𝐴 ‘ 𝑛 ) ) )
8 7 simprbi ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ ( < Chain 𝐵 ) → ∀ 𝑛 ∈ ( dom 𝐴 ∖ { 0 } ) ( 𝐴 ‘ ( 𝑛 − 1 ) ) < ( 𝐴 ‘ 𝑛 ) )
9 8 adantl ⊢ ( ( 𝐴 ∈ ( 𝑅 Chain 𝐵 ) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ( < Chain 𝐵 ) ) → ∀ 𝑛 ∈ ( dom 𝐴 ∖ { 0 } ) ( 𝐴 ‘ ( 𝑛 − 1 ) ) < ( 𝐴 ‘ 𝑛 ) )
10 9 r19.21bi ⊢ ( ( ( 𝐴 ∈ ( 𝑅 Chain 𝐵 ) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ( < Chain 𝐵 ) ) ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ( dom 𝐴 ∖ { 0 } ) ) → ( 𝐴 ‘ ( 𝑛 − 1 ) ) < ( 𝐴 ‘ 𝑛 ) )
11 brin ⊢ ( ( 𝐴 ‘ ( 𝑛 − 1 ) ) ( 𝑅 ∩ < ) ( 𝐴 ‘ 𝑛 ) ↔ ( ( 𝐴 ‘ ( 𝑛 − 1 ) ) 𝑅 ( 𝐴 ‘ 𝑛 ) ∧ ( 𝐴 ‘ ( 𝑛 − 1 ) ) < ( 𝐴 ‘ 𝑛 ) ) )
12 6 10 11 sylanbrc ⊢ ( ( ( 𝐴 ∈ ( 𝑅 Chain 𝐵 ) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ( < Chain 𝐵 ) ) ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ( dom 𝐴 ∖ { 0 } ) ) → ( 𝐴 ‘ ( 𝑛 − 1 ) ) ( 𝑅 ∩ < ) ( 𝐴 ‘ 𝑛 ) )
13 12 ralrimiva ⊢ ( ( 𝐴 ∈ ( 𝑅 Chain 𝐵 ) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ( < Chain 𝐵 ) ) → ∀ 𝑛 ∈ ( dom 𝐴 ∖ { 0 } ) ( 𝐴 ‘ ( 𝑛 − 1 ) ) ( 𝑅 ∩ < ) ( 𝐴 ‘ 𝑛 ) )
14 ischn ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ ( ( 𝑅 ∩ < ) Chain 𝐵 ) ↔ ( 𝐴 ∈ Word 𝐵 ∧ ∀ 𝑛 ∈ ( dom 𝐴 ∖ { 0 } ) ( 𝐴 ‘ ( 𝑛 − 1 ) ) ( 𝑅 ∩ < ) ( 𝐴 ‘ 𝑛 ) ) )
15 3 13 14 sylanbrc ⊢ ( ( 𝐴 ∈ ( 𝑅 Chain 𝐵 ) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ( < Chain 𝐵 ) ) → 𝐴 ∈ ( ( 𝑅 ∩ < ) Chain 𝐵 ) )