Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem lcvnbtwn3

Description: The covers relation implies no in-betweenness. ( cvnbtwn3 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Jan-2015)

Ref Expression
Hypotheses lcvnbtwn.s ⊢ 𝑆 = ( LSubSp ‘ 𝑊 )
lcvnbtwn.c ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖L ‘ 𝑊 )
lcvnbtwn.w ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑋 )
lcvnbtwn.r ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑆 )
lcvnbtwn.t ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆 )
lcvnbtwn.u ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆 )
lcvnbtwn.d ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑅 𝐶 𝑇 )
lcvnbtwn3.p ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑅 ⊆ 𝑈 )
lcvnbtwn3.q ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑈 ⊊ 𝑇 )
Assertion lcvnbtwn3 ( 𝜑 → 𝑈 = 𝑅 )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 lcvnbtwn.s ⊢ 𝑆 = ( LSubSp ‘ 𝑊 )
2 lcvnbtwn.c ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖L ‘ 𝑊 )
3 lcvnbtwn.w ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑋 )
4 lcvnbtwn.r ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑆 )
5 lcvnbtwn.t ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆 )
6 lcvnbtwn.u ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆 )
7 lcvnbtwn.d ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑅 𝐶 𝑇 )
8 lcvnbtwn3.p ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑅 ⊆ 𝑈 )
9 lcvnbtwn3.q ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑈 ⊊ 𝑇 )
10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 lcvnbtwn ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ¬ ( 𝑅 ⊊ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑈 ⊊ 𝑇 ) )
11 iman ⊢ ( ( ( 𝑅 ⊆ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑈 ⊊ 𝑇 ) → 𝑅 = 𝑈 ) ↔ ¬ ( ( 𝑅 ⊆ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑈 ⊊ 𝑇 ) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 = 𝑈 ) )
12 eqcom ⊢ ( 𝑈 = 𝑅 ↔ 𝑅 = 𝑈 )
13 12 imbi2i ⊢ ( ( ( 𝑅 ⊆ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑈 ⊊ 𝑇 ) → 𝑈 = 𝑅 ) ↔ ( ( 𝑅 ⊆ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑈 ⊊ 𝑇 ) → 𝑅 = 𝑈 ) )
14 dfpss2 ⊢ ( 𝑅 ⊊ 𝑈 ↔ ( 𝑅 ⊆ 𝑈 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 = 𝑈 ) )
15 14 anbi1i ⊢ ( ( 𝑅 ⊊ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑈 ⊊ 𝑇 ) ↔ ( ( 𝑅 ⊆ 𝑈 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 = 𝑈 ) ∧ 𝑈 ⊊ 𝑇 ) )
16 an32 ⊢ ( ( ( 𝑅 ⊆ 𝑈 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 = 𝑈 ) ∧ 𝑈 ⊊ 𝑇 ) ↔ ( ( 𝑅 ⊆ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑈 ⊊ 𝑇 ) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 = 𝑈 ) )
17 15 16 bitri ⊢ ( ( 𝑅 ⊊ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑈 ⊊ 𝑇 ) ↔ ( ( 𝑅 ⊆ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑈 ⊊ 𝑇 ) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 = 𝑈 ) )
18 17 notbii ⊢ ( ¬ ( 𝑅 ⊊ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑈 ⊊ 𝑇 ) ↔ ¬ ( ( 𝑅 ⊆ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑈 ⊊ 𝑇 ) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 = 𝑈 ) )
19 11 13 18 3bitr4ri ⊢ ( ¬ ( 𝑅 ⊊ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑈 ⊊ 𝑇 ) ↔ ( ( 𝑅 ⊆ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑈 ⊊ 𝑇 ) → 𝑈 = 𝑅 ) )
20 10 19 sylib ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( ( 𝑅 ⊆ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑈 ⊊ 𝑇 ) → 𝑈 = 𝑅 ) )
21 8 9 20 mp2and ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑈 = 𝑅 )