Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem tskhf

Description: A nonempty Tarski class contains the whole finite cumulative hierarchy. (This proof does not use ax-inf .) (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-2011) Restate using the defined HF symbol. (Revised by Eric Schmidt, 24-Sep-2026)

Ref Expression
Assertion tskhf ( ( 𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝑇 ≠ ∅ ) → HF ⊆ 𝑇 )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 df-hf ⊢ HF = ∪ ( 𝑅1 “ ω )
2 1 eleq2i ⊢ ( 𝑦 ∈ HF ↔ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ ( 𝑅1 “ ω ) )
3 eluni2 ⊢ ( 𝑦 ∈ ∪ ( 𝑅1 “ ω ) ↔ ∃ 𝑥 ∈ ( 𝑅1 “ ω ) 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 )
4 2 3 bitri ⊢ ( 𝑦 ∈ HF ↔ ∃ 𝑥 ∈ ( 𝑅1 “ ω ) 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 )
5 r1fnon ⊢ 𝑅1 Fn On
6 fnfun ⊢ ( 𝑅1 Fn On → Fun 𝑅1 )
7 5 6 ax-mp ⊢ Fun 𝑅1
8 fvelima ⊢ ( ( Fun 𝑅1 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ( 𝑅1 “ ω ) ) → ∃ 𝑦 ∈ ω ( 𝑅1 ‘ 𝑦 ) = 𝑥 )
9 7 8 mpan ⊢ ( 𝑥 ∈ ( 𝑅1 “ ω ) → ∃ 𝑦 ∈ ω ( 𝑅1 ‘ 𝑦 ) = 𝑥 )
10 r1tr ⊢ Tr ( 𝑅1 ‘ 𝑦 )
11 treq ⊢ ( ( 𝑅1 ‘ 𝑦 ) = 𝑥 → ( Tr ( 𝑅1 ‘ 𝑦 ) ↔ Tr 𝑥 ) )
12 10 11 mpbii ⊢ ( ( 𝑅1 ‘ 𝑦 ) = 𝑥 → Tr 𝑥 )
13 12 rexlimivw ⊢ ( ∃ 𝑦 ∈ ω ( 𝑅1 ‘ 𝑦 ) = 𝑥 → Tr 𝑥 )
14 trss ⊢ ( Tr 𝑥 → ( 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥 ) )
15 9 13 14 3syl ⊢ ( 𝑥 ∈ ( 𝑅1 “ ω ) → ( 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥 ) )
16 15 adantl ⊢ ( ( ( 𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝑇 ≠ ∅ ) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ( 𝑅1 “ ω ) ) → ( 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥 ) )
17 tskr1om ⊢ ( ( 𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝑇 ≠ ∅ ) → ( 𝑅1 “ ω ) ⊆ 𝑇 )
18 17 sseld ⊢ ( ( 𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝑇 ≠ ∅ ) → ( 𝑥 ∈ ( 𝑅1 “ ω ) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝑇 ) )
19 tskss ⊢ ( ( 𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥 ) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 )
20 19 3exp ⊢ ( 𝑇 ∈ Tarski → ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝑇 → ( 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ) ) )
21 20 adantr ⊢ ( ( 𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝑇 ≠ ∅ ) → ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝑇 → ( 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ) ) )
22 18 21 syld ⊢ ( ( 𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝑇 ≠ ∅ ) → ( 𝑥 ∈ ( 𝑅1 “ ω ) → ( 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ) ) )
23 22 imp ⊢ ( ( ( 𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝑇 ≠ ∅ ) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ( 𝑅1 “ ω ) ) → ( 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ) )
24 16 23 syld ⊢ ( ( ( 𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝑇 ≠ ∅ ) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ( 𝑅1 “ ω ) ) → ( 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ) )
25 24 rexlimdva ⊢ ( ( 𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝑇 ≠ ∅ ) → ( ∃ 𝑥 ∈ ( 𝑅1 “ ω ) 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ) )
26 4 25 biimtrid ⊢ ( ( 𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝑇 ≠ ∅ ) → ( 𝑦 ∈ HF → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑇 ) )
27 26 ssrdv ⊢ ( ( 𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝑇 ≠ ∅ ) → HF ⊆ 𝑇 )