Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem wl-sbnf1

Description: Two ways expressing that x is effectively not free in ph . Simplified version of sbnf2 . Note: This theorem shows that sbnf2 has unnecessary distinct variable constraints. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 28-Jul-2019)

Ref Expression
Assertion wl-sbnf1 ( ∀ 𝑥𝑦 𝜑 → ( Ⅎ 𝑥 𝜑 ↔ ∀ 𝑥𝑦 ( 𝜑 → [ 𝑦 / 𝑥 ] 𝜑 ) ) )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 nf5 ( Ⅎ 𝑥 𝜑 ↔ ∀ 𝑥 ( 𝜑 → ∀ 𝑥 𝜑 ) )
2 nfa1 𝑥𝑥𝑦 𝜑
3 wl-sbhbt ( ∀ 𝑥𝑦 𝜑 → ( ( 𝜑 → ∀ 𝑥 𝜑 ) ↔ ∀ 𝑦 ( 𝜑 → [ 𝑦 / 𝑥 ] 𝜑 ) ) )
4 2 3 albid ( ∀ 𝑥𝑦 𝜑 → ( ∀ 𝑥 ( 𝜑 → ∀ 𝑥 𝜑 ) ↔ ∀ 𝑥𝑦 ( 𝜑 → [ 𝑦 / 𝑥 ] 𝜑 ) ) )
5 1 4 syl5bb ( ∀ 𝑥𝑦 𝜑 → ( Ⅎ 𝑥 𝜑 ↔ ∀ 𝑥𝑦 ( 𝜑 → [ 𝑦 / 𝑥 ] 𝜑 ) ) )