Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem bj-idres

Description: Alternate expression for the restricted identity relation. The advantage of that expression is to expose it as a "bounded" class, being included in the Cartesian square of the restricting class. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Dec-2023)

This is an alternate of idinxpresid (see idinxpres ). See also elrid and elidinxp . (Proof modification is discouraged.)

Ref Expression
Assertion bj-idres ( I ↾ 𝐴 ) = ( I ∩ ( 𝐴 × 𝐴 ) )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 df-res ⊢ ( I ↾ 𝐴 ) = ( I ∩ ( 𝐴 × V ) )
2 inss1 ⊢ ( I ∩ ( 𝐴 × V ) ) ⊆ I
3 relinxp ⊢ Rel ( I ∩ ( 𝐴 × V ) )
4 elin ⊢ ( ⟨ 𝑥 , 𝑦 ⟩ ∈ ( I ∩ ( 𝐴 × V ) ) ↔ ( ⟨ 𝑥 , 𝑦 ⟩ ∈ I ∧ ⟨ 𝑥 , 𝑦 ⟩ ∈ ( 𝐴 × V ) ) )
5 bj-opelidb1 ⊢ ( ⟨ 𝑥 , 𝑦 ⟩ ∈ I ↔ ( 𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ) )
6 5 simprbi ⊢ ( ⟨ 𝑥 , 𝑦 ⟩ ∈ I → 𝑥 = 𝑦 )
7 opelxp1 ⊢ ( ⟨ 𝑥 , 𝑦 ⟩ ∈ ( 𝐴 × V ) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 )
8 simpr ⊢ ( ( 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 )
9 eleq1w ⊢ ( 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ) )
10 9 biimpa ⊢ ( ( 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 )
11 8 10 jca ⊢ ( ( 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ) → ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ) )
12 6 7 11 syl2an ⊢ ( ( ⟨ 𝑥 , 𝑦 ⟩ ∈ I ∧ ⟨ 𝑥 , 𝑦 ⟩ ∈ ( 𝐴 × V ) ) → ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ) )
13 4 12 sylbi ⊢ ( ⟨ 𝑥 , 𝑦 ⟩ ∈ ( I ∩ ( 𝐴 × V ) ) → ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ) )
14 opelxpi ⊢ ( ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ) → ⟨ 𝑥 , 𝑦 ⟩ ∈ ( 𝐴 × 𝐴 ) )
15 13 14 syl ⊢ ( ⟨ 𝑥 , 𝑦 ⟩ ∈ ( I ∩ ( 𝐴 × V ) ) → ⟨ 𝑥 , 𝑦 ⟩ ∈ ( 𝐴 × 𝐴 ) )
16 3 15 relssi ⊢ ( I ∩ ( 𝐴 × V ) ) ⊆ ( 𝐴 × 𝐴 )
17 2 16 ssini ⊢ ( I ∩ ( 𝐴 × V ) ) ⊆ ( I ∩ ( 𝐴 × 𝐴 ) )
18 ssv ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ V
19 xpss2 ⊢ ( 𝐴 ⊆ V → ( 𝐴 × 𝐴 ) ⊆ ( 𝐴 × V ) )
20 sslin ⊢ ( ( 𝐴 × 𝐴 ) ⊆ ( 𝐴 × V ) → ( I ∩ ( 𝐴 × 𝐴 ) ) ⊆ ( I ∩ ( 𝐴 × V ) ) )
21 18 19 20 mp2b ⊢ ( I ∩ ( 𝐴 × 𝐴 ) ) ⊆ ( I ∩ ( 𝐴 × V ) )
22 17 21 eqssi ⊢ ( I ∩ ( 𝐴 × V ) ) = ( I ∩ ( 𝐴 × 𝐴 ) )
23 1 22 eqtri ⊢ ( I ↾ 𝐴 ) = ( I ∩ ( 𝐴 × 𝐴 ) )