Description: Sufficient condition for the restricted identity relation to agree with
equality. Note that the instance of bj-ideqg with _V substituted
for V is a direct consequence of bj-idreseq . This is a
strengthening of resieq which should be proved from it (note that
currently, resieq relies on ideq ). Note that the intersection in
the antecedent is not very meaningful, but is a device to prove versions
with either class assumed to be a set. It could be enough to prove the
version with a disjunctive antecedent:
|- ( ( A e. C \/ B e. C ) -> ... ) . (Contributed by BJ, 25-Dec-2023)