Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem bnj1173

Description: Technical lemma for bnj69 . This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011) (New usage is discouraged.)

Ref Expression
Hypotheses bnj1173.3 ⊢ C = trCl X A R ∩ B
bnj1173.5 ⊢ θ ↔ R FrSe A ∧ X ∈ A ∧ z ∈ trCl X A R ∧ R FrSe A ∧ z ∈ A ∧ w ∈ A
bnj1173.9 ⊢ φ ∧ ψ → R FrSe A
bnj1173.17 ⊢ φ ∧ ψ → X ∈ A
Assertion bnj1173 ⊢ φ ∧ ψ ∧ z ∈ C → θ ↔ w ∈ A

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 bnj1173.3 ⊢ C = trCl X A R ∩ B
2 bnj1173.5 ⊢ θ ↔ R FrSe A ∧ X ∈ A ∧ z ∈ trCl X A R ∧ R FrSe A ∧ z ∈ A ∧ w ∈ A
3 bnj1173.9 ⊢ φ ∧ ψ → R FrSe A
4 bnj1173.17 ⊢ φ ∧ ψ → X ∈ A
5 3simpc ⊢ R FrSe A ∧ X ∈ A ∧ z ∈ trCl X A R ∧ R FrSe A ∧ z ∈ A ∧ w ∈ A → R FrSe A ∧ z ∈ A ∧ w ∈ A
6 3 3adant3 ⊢ φ ∧ ψ ∧ z ∈ C → R FrSe A
7 4 3adant3 ⊢ φ ∧ ψ ∧ z ∈ C → X ∈ A
8 elin ⊢ z ∈ trCl X A R ∩ B ↔ z ∈ trCl X A R ∧ z ∈ B
9 8 simplbi ⊢ z ∈ trCl X A R ∩ B → z ∈ trCl X A R
10 9 1 eleq2s ⊢ z ∈ C → z ∈ trCl X A R
11 10 3ad2ant3 ⊢ φ ∧ ψ ∧ z ∈ C → z ∈ trCl X A R
12 pm3.21 ⊢ R FrSe A ∧ X ∈ A ∧ z ∈ trCl X A R → R FrSe A ∧ z ∈ A ∧ w ∈ A → R FrSe A ∧ z ∈ A ∧ w ∈ A ∧ R FrSe A ∧ X ∈ A ∧ z ∈ trCl X A R
13 6 7 11 12 syl3anc ⊢ φ ∧ ψ ∧ z ∈ C → R FrSe A ∧ z ∈ A ∧ w ∈ A → R FrSe A ∧ z ∈ A ∧ w ∈ A ∧ R FrSe A ∧ X ∈ A ∧ z ∈ trCl X A R
14 bnj170 ⊢ R FrSe A ∧ X ∈ A ∧ z ∈ trCl X A R ∧ R FrSe A ∧ z ∈ A ∧ w ∈ A ↔ R FrSe A ∧ z ∈ A ∧ w ∈ A ∧ R FrSe A ∧ X ∈ A ∧ z ∈ trCl X A R
15 13 14 imbitrrdi ⊢ φ ∧ ψ ∧ z ∈ C → R FrSe A ∧ z ∈ A ∧ w ∈ A → R FrSe A ∧ X ∈ A ∧ z ∈ trCl X A R ∧ R FrSe A ∧ z ∈ A ∧ w ∈ A
16 5 15 impbid2 ⊢ φ ∧ ψ ∧ z ∈ C → R FrSe A ∧ X ∈ A ∧ z ∈ trCl X A R ∧ R FrSe A ∧ z ∈ A ∧ w ∈ A ↔ R FrSe A ∧ z ∈ A ∧ w ∈ A
17 2 16 bitrid ⊢ φ ∧ ψ ∧ z ∈ C → θ ↔ R FrSe A ∧ z ∈ A ∧ w ∈ A
18 bnj1147 ⊢ trCl X A R ⊆ A
19 18 11 bnj1213 ⊢ φ ∧ ψ ∧ z ∈ C → z ∈ A
20 6 19 jca ⊢ φ ∧ ψ ∧ z ∈ C → R FrSe A ∧ z ∈ A
21 20 biantrurd ⊢ φ ∧ ψ ∧ z ∈ C → w ∈ A ↔ R FrSe A ∧ z ∈ A ∧ w ∈ A
22 17 21 bitr4d ⊢ φ ∧ ψ ∧ z ∈ C → θ ↔ w ∈ A